Mills therefore concludes that the racial contract is superior to the social contract because the racial contract is rooted in actual historical reality. Mills is trying to be an architect building an inside out method of trying to add another element to contract theory. Mills’ view of his racial contract is not unlike Rosseau who believed the social contract was intended to protect the property of rich individuals from those who did not have any property. Where Mills and Rosseau differ is that Mills’ theory is based on race, while Rosseau’s theory is based on economics. Mills then turns from an architect to a doctor trying to offer a prescription. His prescription is to counteract racial oppression where all individuals have equal footing. He further asserts that universal enlightenment ideals become real tangible procedures which fosters equality in society. For Mills, he believes that “to move to [a] nonideal theory [is] to understand the role of race in the modernity for which the contract metaphor has seemed peculiarly …show more content…
Another failure of racial liberalism was the fact that the United States government was unable to support the concept financially. The last reason that racial liberalism fails, which is the central theme to the failing of Mills’ argument is that the theory seems to be an overreaching solution. Racial liberalism tries to be a single solution to a very complex problem. This is analogous to a computer programmer trying to solve a complex problem with one single line of code. This would be fruitless since it would take many lines of code which logically connect to the problem, thus solving the problem. Racial liberalism is one line of code trying to answer a complex