These papers came to be known as the Federalist Papers advocating proclamations of the constitution. As James Madison’s states in Federalist Paper 51 “If men were angels, no government would be necessary” (). He reassures us here that we need a strong government, but we would still have our liberty. Also, stated in Federalist paper 51 Madison describes what we all come to know as checks and balances. Meaning that no one group will be dominant, and can be checked for having too much power. Another term brought up in Madison’s essays would have to be fractioning on Federalist paper 10. Madison’s meant that he feared the grouping of the poor not the wealthy. Madison solution would be either “the one, by removing its causes; the other, by controlling its effects” (). One thing that Madison learned was that we cannot control the source of a faction. The only thing we could possibly do is control the effects of fractioning. Madison essays persistently proclaimed that having a big republic would make it harder for fractions to unify. Minorities such as small land owners would have federalist on their …show more content…
Some of these questions are towards the federalist, and the meaning of their statements. Questioning the representative democracy, government institution and so on. Others argue about the Anti-federalists, and how they were portrayed as the bad people for not wanting a strong authority. Whereas today, we still have the thought of why the government have so much power. The anti-federalist was not wrong forecasting some our now problems. These were just some of the secondary arguments about the Federalists Papers and anti-Federalist papers. In my own personal view, I think ratifying the U.S constitution was the way to go. Just having enough balanced powers between government is an okay system. Not the greatest, but I’m sure I couldn’t come up with anything