In past readings, I have had a difficult time finding connections. However, in this reading I was able to find a distinct parallel. One of the biggest takeaways I had from this reading was the negative externalities that the Emperor believed the invention would have on his society. This was interesting, as in our society, it is not very common that the invention process is ceased due to negative externalities. In my business ethics course, I had a debate regarding autonomous vehicles. I found the analysis of both these inventions to be similar. In both cases, the invention’s externalities must be analyzed in order to determine whether the positives from that invention outweigh the negatives. In the case of the autonomous cars, I felt that the positives far outweighed the negatives. There was a statistic in which I learned that 90% of car crashes in the United States are caused by human error. Through autonomous vehicles, this variability would be taken out. The roads would be much safer if we could take human error out of the equation. In this specific case, the positive externalities far outweigh the negative externalities. The technology of autonomous vehicles may have drawbacks; however, the technology as a whole will greatly improve society as a whole. In this reading, the emperor determined that the flying machine had more negative externalities than positive. He believed that the flying machine would not advance