McCann and Kim introduce intersectionality like a kaleidoscope, a shifting prism of differences to examine the mobile and multiple configurations of domination in our lives (pg.163). In the 1980’s, an explosion of writing was recognized from Black women, women of color, and transnational feminist scholars that redirected the White hegemonic feminist theory. This chapter is an archive of challenging debates from various forms of scholarship on race, nationality, sexuality, class, gender, and transnationalism. In addition, these writings express the experiences of marginalized women that were ignored. The authors have divided this chapter into three subsections, Intersectionality, Social Processes/Configuring Differences, and Boundaries and Belongings to examine intersectionality theory from different perspectives.
Conversations about Intersectionality
1. The Positions
2. The Connections
3. The Challenges
The Positions Thornton-Dill and Zambrana’s essay, “Critical Thinking About Inequality: An Emerging Lens,” follows Crenshaw’s intersectionality theory that social …show more content…
Like Thornton-Dill and Zambrana, Nash agrees with Crenshaw’s theory in intersectionality analysis, however, she calls intersectionality a scholarly buzzword (p.195). Nash’s position is for feminists and anti-racist scholars to interrogate the concept of identity Crenshaw argues. She maintains, her attention is not dismantling intersectional theorizing; instead, she is interesting in highlighting the murkiness of intersectionality. Nash confronts intersectional scholars, feminists, and anti-racist theorists with what she calls “unresolved conflicts” (p.195) to challenge what she believes are confusing concepts of identity and oppression. Nash offers four unsolved concerns to ponder within intersectional