Valuing the husbandry of the farm preserves the work quality. In the story “Renewing Husbandry,” Wendell Berry argues that in order to renew husbandry a cultural shift has to happen. Therefore, individuals cannot conform to the idea of industrialized farming by ignoring the community created around farming. The advancements in industrialized farming affect local communities and the economy of the communities. Preserving husbandry requires restraints on the advancements in industrialization. Industrialized farming details negative impacts on local communities. Shared help holds together a farm in rural neighborhoods. Thus, once the advancements took place, the rural farms struggled, “The tractors and other mechanical devices certainly were saving labor of the farmers and farmlands who had moved away, but those who had stayed were working harder and longer than ever” (Berry, 2005, para. 5). The advancements display the quantity rather than the quality of the work that the rural farmers strive for in husbanding their farms. Although industrialized farming works well with the quantity of work, the process affects the people and land. The article claims, “Those large economies, in their understanding and in their accounting, have excluded any concern for the land…show more content… Setting limits on industrialization prevents an effect on the rural communities.
Despite the enhancements of production, the incline of industrialized farming demonstrates a negative impact on rural farmers. For instance, the local communities experience longer hours of work to keep up with the advancements in the big cities. Then, industrialized farming requires costly fuel and equipment that rural farmers struggle to afford. Finally, setting boundaries on the extent of the advancements prevent issues with the rural farms. Despite the quantity of work done by industrialization, the rural farmers prefer the quality of their
