The book Frankenstein is filled with many lessons of which are quite important. Among all these lessons is the lesson of responsibility. The book shows how crucial it is to know the consequences of one's actions. A question that is asked in the book is how responsible is Victor Frankenstein for his creatures actions, and could he have prevented those actions? In Frankenstein, Mary Shelly illustrates responsibility through the relationship of Frankenstein and the monster. Life is created everyday, it's how the world grows. Without the creation of life the earth would never be replenished. Creating life is a good or bad thing, and it also comes with a tremendous amount of responsibility. An animal or human cannot have a kid without …show more content…
Education is critically important for living creatures especially for humans. Considering the time period Victor Frankenstein lived in education was taken more seriously. In the days of Frankenstein the phone didn’t exist, as well as the games we have nowadays. Also a person who was educated in Victor’s day was more respected, or at least more likely to be respected. In that matter the neglection of helping him learn any basic knowledge such as speech is cruel. Victor left his creature to it’s learn english on it’s own, not only that but what it considers right and …show more content…
In that matter Victor was the key to having happiness. Frankenstein caused the death of his family by depriving a creature that has been rejected all his life of happiness. If Victor Frankenstein had gone with his Creatures wishes he would be happily married and he would still have Clerval. Not only that but he would still have most of his family. Victor could’ve made the creature happy. He could’ve prevented all of the deaths caused by his creation if he didn’t neglect his creature and reject helping him.
Another way Frankenstein is responsible for the crimes committed is that he told nobody! He had so many chances to tell his wife, to tell Clerval, to tell his dad. Never once did he tell a person that he’d made a monster and he didn’t know what to do about it. If Frankenstein had done that he could’ve come up with a better solution than leaving his Creature to wreak havoc on his family and friends. In conjunction with that he should’ve kept his creation locked up until he had a solution for the problem. He just let it run free, no locks or