Davis also argues that since most peasants couldn’t write their own stories that authors of a certain time may give a historian a sense of what that author considers realistic for any given time. The issue with peasant portrayal in literature according to Davis is that authors for the most part make the peasant out to be the comedic foil in these works. The next source a historian uses to get a sense of peasant life is Court jurisdictions. Davis believes that these jurisdictions give a rounder picture of what a peasant’s life may entail and gives the historian an insight into the “more salacious side of a peasant’s story”. Davis states that these jurisdiction documents “show a peasant’s expectations and feelings at a time of sudden agitation or crisis.” Davis contemplates why the adventures of three young villagers with a story that seemed akin to a fable would fascinate Judge Jean de Coras: one of the judges on the case to write eloquently about it after one of the parties is convicted to