Rhetoric Analysis

Words: 763
Pages: 4

The audience, rhetoric, and artifact are all components of rhetoric. These components are included in the rhetorical triangle and influence the style and purpose of the writing as well as persuading the audience. There are various types of rhetorical methods that are used in different types of academic and non-academic writing. In natural sciences and applied fields, different rhetorical strategies are used, although in similar academic fields. Although, the natural sciences and applied fields are in similar academic fields, they utilize different rhetorical strategies. Different rhetorical strategies can influence and alter the information being presented, allowing for a specific interpretation and perception of the material being presented. …show more content…
The IMRaD structure allows writers to present and report the information they discovered in a scientific manner, in addition to allowing the audience or other scientists in the same field to follow along with how they obtained the results and discoveries through the process of the experiment. In addition to providing experimental data and information, the article discusses the results without any bias or objectivity. The research conducted provides data and content directed towards a specific audience of scientists, science researchers, consumers of science videos, and the content creators of the science videos. When writing in applied fields, the format of the article is organized with headers as well as for the allowance of bias and objectivity throughout the content. Natural sciences are articles with the intent of informing the audience about the research methods used and the process to getting to the result, whereas applied fields are articles that contain content that the audience can relate to. In the article, “Writing about nursing research: a story telling approach,” Gavin Fairbairn and Alex Carson write about an audience involved in nursing or medical research or those who consume …show more content…
The researchers analyzed the data collected using “SPSS statistical software” (Davis et al., 2003). al, 2020), the software detected the predictor variables in the experiment. The use of tables and figures were used throughout the paper, supporting the evidence provided within the text. Furthermore, in comparison to the article written in applied fields, “Writing about nursing research: a storytelling approach,” the authors want to prove that using storytelling as a research method should not always be viewed as a method of retrieving data and manipulating it, but as a way to listen and learn from one another. The data collected is done through qualitative approaches, but presented in a narrative form. The rhetors state that “the plots for those stories develop the research process – by formulating questions and methods for answering them, by gathering data and by attempting to make sense of it” (Fairbairn and Carson, 2002,