Even though Jon Henley does not clearly tell us what side he is on, but he does give clues in the text and by the questions, he places in the text. For example, on page 2, paragraph 2, it reads, ‘He was almost dead. He was dead when we came back down." Their sherpa did manage to help one of the people they found who was still alive.’ When the author wrote, “Their sherpa did manage to help one of the people they found who was still alive.” after the man had died, it was not because he needed to write that, Henley included it because he chose to. It causes the reader to infer that Jon Henley believed including that the sherpa had saved someone was very important. Lastly, Henley writes, ‘So should the Shuttleworths have stopped and tried to help? There are no formal guidelines issued to climbers, and we do not know the risk it might have meant for their own lives. But can it ever be right, in the words of mountain leaders Chris and Simon Holloway, for climbers to "carry on to the summit, while there are living people dying behind them”?’ When he asks, “So should the Shuttleworths have stopped and tried to help?”, He then includes, “ But can it ever be right,”. This question followed up with another question is an example of how Jon Henley believes human beings are more important than reaching a high