As you can see, Martin Luther’s message of equality among segregation is not an easy one to give the appropriate amount of praise and worth that it deserves. In his words, “It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned.” (Luther, 3) dedicates the emphasis in a straightforward way. For that reason, I would argue that Susan B. Anthony's speech, on Women’s Rights to vote, does not flow together as well. Dr. Martin uses sequencing and chronology along with paragraph structuring to his advantage which is then developed over the whole length of the speech. As a result, a definitive rhythm is pronounced that Anthony’s shorter speech is missing. A line that indicates his varying lengths and simplicity consists of, “I have a dream today!” (Luther, 22). As an addition, Luther uses a flashback to perceive a statement regarding the specific day in age, “But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free.” (Luther, 3). Convincingly, the devices added give an extra effect that some pieces of writing miss, and …show more content…
Dr.Martin’s work was manipulated and torn apart to see injustices in action with the tone and a cherry on top of precision with God-given rights, the structure and format of the words with diction to prove a point of active racism, and how emotion and ethics worked to sustain an effortless flow with rhetoric devices. The advanced piece had a broad overview on an earthly issue but still was direct and addressed a lot of particular claims. In total, the speech targets the division we have as a nation amongst segregation, discrimination, relating back to the “Declaration of Independence”. Afterall, it’s an issue that has been the focus of societies since the beginning of time, “Five score years,... .”, “One hundred years ago,... .” and “One hundred years later,... .”, who knows where we will find ourselves, as a country, in our one hundred, five score-