Rhetorical Analysis Of Kathleen Clark

Words: 875
Pages: 4

Rhetorical Analysis: Kathleen Clark vs. E.J. Dionne Jr. The latest election has been the most dreadful election in the history. It has left everyone curious and worried about Donald Trump’s interest in business. Will he leave his business life behind? There have been two articles found focusing on politics posted by The Washington Post. The article by E.J Dionne Jr. is more effective than Kathleen Clark because he presents an emotional effect of realization by his tone (pathos), includes arrangement of evidence and reasons on being equal (logos), and builds a connection with his audience along with credibility (ethos). The article “Congress needs to restrict the president’s financial conflicts” by Kathleen Clark is referring to Donald Trump …show more content…
Clark uses pathos by providing a serious emotion and passion to persuade. But her pathos isn’t convincing enough because there’s not enough support. Throughout her piece, Clark states that “The significance of the 1989 law change was not immediately apparent because presidents since then continued to act as though they were bound by the conflict statue.” She includes this in the passage to give information about how the law changed in 1989, whereas it affected everyone but the president. This uses logos because she provides facts and reasons about the history. Ethos is used in this article by including her personal saying and the way she delivers the content to the audience. The extrinsic ethos is she is a law professor at Washington University and she practices ethics law. There’s good sense because she is an intelligent woman about her subject. Clark argues that “The president should be bound by financial conflict standards, just as other executive branch employees are.” This brings good moral character because this reveals how sincere Clark is. The good will in this article is not satisfying. Clark writes in a language that only connects to readers who have a good knowledge in …show more content…
Dionne uses pathos by he expresses that “Surely Cotton wants to be consistent.” This quote gives a signal about him being sarcastic and makes the readers realize that Cotton isn’t going to lead in advising Donald Trump. This brings emotion of realization. Also, Dionne claims that “Republicans did an extraordinary job raising doubts about Clinton-…” He said that to exaggerate his anger and bring attention to the readers. Dionne uses logos by using real reasons on why it’s more important to be equal and to leave the organizations, foundations, and business’s behind to become a better president. Dionne uses many facts and logical reasons that support his argument. He uses quotes from Tom Cotton, Reince Priebus, Darrell Isa, Jason Chaffetz, and John Podhoretz to provide expert opinions. Dionne uses an example by Republican Reince Priebus by expressing “Priebus must thus be hard at work right now on a plan for Trump to sell off his assets.” He is overemphasizing how Priebus isn’t working on a plan for Trump. The extrinsic ethos in this article is he writes about politics twice a week, and is a government professor at Georgetown University. Dionne is an intelligent man who includes explanations. There’s good will because the way his text is written is