Despite potential shortcomings in the rhetorical strategies employed, the argument gains credibility and strength by relying on authoritative voices and well-established sources. The weight of these endorsements enhances the persuasiveness of the message, signaling that the call for reform is not merely an emotional plea but is grounded in well-researched and expert-supported insights. The central theme resonates powerfully—transformation is imperative for a fairer and more accessible organ transplantation system. The rallying cry for reform echoes loudly, compelling a united effort to overcome existing challenges and improve the overall effectiveness of organ transplantation. It emphasizes a collective responsibility to ensure that individuals in need do not face insurmountable barriers, urging society to come together and effect positive change. In essence, Victory's argument, while facing hurdles in the realms of logos and emotional appeal, manages to stand on solid ground due to the influential support of credible