Rhetorical Devices In 12 Angry Men

Rhetorical Analysis Three stages of thinking in this film is when they first got there information. Then the information was processed and they thought about the information given. Lastly they created their coherent thought with the help of other people's thoughts and opinions. The first stage of thinking was the gathering of information. In this movie the first information that was gathered was that the boy had murdered his father. The second stage of thinking is when you process the information given. This happens in the movie when all the men are sitting around the table and are talking about the fact that the boy was most likely guilty. The information was setting in as they received the information. Now they are thinking about the information …show more content…
In the movie there was one man who got everyone thinking of the other possibilities on why the boy might not be guilty. Some of these examples included that the man bought the same knife at a store down the street that the boy had. Everyone thought this was a unique knife when it wasn't. From learning more details about the case one gets to create a thought based on all the information received.
A logical fallacy is a fault in an argument due to unsound reasoning. Several logical fallacies were committed by members of the jury during the trial. Logical fallacies are the reason the boy was so quickly dismissed as guilty by many jurors from the start. One obvious logical fallacy showcased early on is the Appeal to Belief fallacy. One juror, when asked why he voted guilty, explained that he chose the belief favored by the majority. Something is not guaranteed to be true simply because many people believe so. Another logical fallacy used in an argument by the jury was the Hasty Generalization Fallacy. It is assumed that the boy is likely to have committed this murder because he is from the slums. This is a generalization that every person from a low income area is a criminal. Just because crime rates are higher in such areas does not make the residents inherently unlawful. It would be unfair to make such an assumption in a court of …show more content…
As the 12 men were discussing in the room, there is a lot of information that supports how the boy is not guilty. All but one man in this believe that he was not guilty and convinced all the people that there that the boy is not guilty. The information that made me think that he was not guilty was that the man bought the same knife at a store down the street and that the knife wasn't unique in any way. The second reason why I believe the boy is not guilty is because the man was stabbed from an awkward angle and wouldn't of gotten stabbed from underneath. Lastly the lady needs glasses so maybe she didn't see what she thought she

Show More

Review of Angels on a Pin, Letter From Birmingham Jail, Civil Disobedience and Other Essays

Silent Spring - Rachel Carson Essay

Rhetorical Devices In 12 Angry Men

Related Documents: Rhetorical Devices In 12 Angry Men

Review of Angels on a Pin, Letter From Birmingham Jail, Civil Disobedience and Other Essays

Silent Spring - Rachel Carson Essay