Rhetorical Devices In Animal Farm

Words: 844
Pages: 4
Open Document
A rhetorical device is a technique used in writing that helps the author persuade the reader toward the topic the author is writing about. Rhetorical devices are also used to help the reader identify the argument that the author has and what stance he or she has on it. The novel Animal Farm by George Orwell is a fictional story of a farm that has been taken over by animals and is now run in the form of a dictatorship with total equality for all members. This may seem like a simple story but it has a underlying meaning behind it and the use of rhetorical devices helps readers to decode the message that George Orwell is writing about. These devices are used by Orwell to expose communism and all its evils. The devices that best help the reader …show more content…
Through the whole book the animals on the farm can be seen using repetition of the word Comrades: “Never mind the milk comrades… Comrade snowball will lead the way.. Follow comrades, the hay is waiting” (26). His use of this repetition helps him to make his point by reminding readers that he is really writing about the soviet union and communism and not just a fictional story about a farm. In the soviet union ,at this time, a word to recognize a friend or brother is the word comrade. Orwell uses this repetition to subtly remind the readers that the animals are actually representing soviets, which helps to prove his point of exposing …show more content…
In the opening chapter of the book Orwell begins by introducing Old Major, a pig that lives on the farm, who is supposed to be representing Karl Marx, the creator of communism. Old major calls all the animals to the barn and tells them of a dream he had of a farm with no humans and where every animal is equal: “Alll habits of man are evil. And, above all, no animal must ever tyrannise over his own kind. Weak or strong, clever or simple, we are brothers… All animals are equal” (11). His use of anthropomorphism helps him to prove his point by giving readers a opportunity to match which leader goes with which animal and why that is so. It also helps the reader to identify what kind of person these leaders were, this you are represented by a cunning animal then you were probably cunning yourself. If you were represented by a wise animal then you would probably also be wise and so on. This is especially evident in the case of napoleon who is representing Joseph Stalin. Napoleon is a very cruel leader on the farm who demands perfection and is really only looking out for himself instead of the people, so was Stalin. In conclusion, rhetorical devices certainly help when trying to suitably explain a complex idea or topic much like Orwell did in Animal Farm. Not only did these devices help the author to get
Show More

Related Documents: Rhetorical Devices In Animal Farm

Rhetorical Devices Used In Animal Farm Essay

other animals. Where do you see this same thing happening in the world around you? The pigs, Squealer most of all, knew how to convince people using rhetoric devices. This is what kept Napoleon in control of the animals. If he wouldn’t have been such an eloquent speaker he would have been in Snowballs position. I think this is also one of the reasons that Benjamin wasn’t one of the leaders because he definitely had the smarts to be a ruler. The pigs used rhetoric devices to cloud the animals judgement…

Words 985 - Pages 4

George Orwell Use Of Allegory In Animal Farm

metaphor about a farm society that represents the human society. Orwell uses the barnyard animals to symbolize human types as he portrays people in the human society. All of the animals have human traits. Overall the whole story is based on the Soviet Union. It can be read on several levels and present many life lessons. b. It is a rhetorical because it tells us that we don't have to work for anyone. It persuades us to work for ourselves. The rhetorical components shows us how the animals worked for…

Words 331 - Pages 2

Examples Of Allegory In Animal Farm

George Orwell's Animal Farm. After reading about some of the main figures and events in the history of the Soviet Union, the parallels between Animal Farm and the rule of Stalin and events in Eastern Europe, Ukraine, and Georgia are present. For example, animalism can be argued to represent communism, Manor Farm is allegorical of Russia, and Mr. Jones could be representative of the Russian Czar, which, in the text, the animals rebel against. Additionally, there are rhetorical components of this…

Words 466 - Pages 2

Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Techniques

freedom. Therefore, Douglass utilizes several rhetorical devices such as simile, repetition and parallelism to convey his attitude about The American Promise. In the beginning of the text, Douglass uses simile to dehumanize slaves by comparing them to horses. He adopts an serious and depressing tone in order to tell the reader the slave’s lack of knowledge. Douglass appeals to the reader by emphasizing how the slave masters treats the slaves as farm animals. As an example, “Larger part of the slaves…

Words 460 - Pages 2

Rhetorical Analysis Of George Orwell's Animal Farm

empire rebelled against their own government in the 1900’s. Comparably, in Animal Farm, many of the animals decide to rebel against their owners, but only because of a 12 year old pig called Old Major. Old Major dislikes being controlled by humans and has a hatred for them, so he decides that the animals should revolt. However, most of the animals are on the fence on whether or not to rebel. In order to convince the other animals to revolt, Old Major creates and reads a speech that uses logical, ethical…

Words 1200 - Pages 5

Rhetorical Analysis Of Against Meat By Jonathan Safran Foer

According to a study in 2008, only 3.2% of the population in the United States are vegetarians. Many people have different opinions on whether killing animals for food is an moral practice or not due to their own set of beliefs. In that small percentage of vegetarians is Jonathan Safran Foer, the author of the article “Against Meat” in the book They Say, I Say. He discusses about why he became a vegetarian through a narrative of different times throughout his own life. His purpose for writing this…

Words 1277 - Pages 6

Purpose George Orwell Essay

the speaker advocates his disapproval of British Imperialism but confesses that his “greatest joy” was being a tormenter, poking at the distressed natives with his bayonet. II. Style In contrast with his other more proclaimed writings such as Animal Farm and 1984 which have a more dark, dystopian, and satirical tone, “Shooting an Elephant” is composed of a more friendly and informal atmosphere: “I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage against the evil-spirited little beasts…

Words 1041 - Pages 5

Food Inc Persuasive Speech

As I was born during the break of the millennium in 1999 I grew up completely oblivious from the technological revolution that my parents know too well. Every birthday or Christmas that I can clearly remember from my childhood is just a memory of me receiving the "new best thing" that a boy would want that year such as the new PlayStation or Xbox of the time. Yet these "new best things" have become the standards in my mind thereafter blinding me from the experiences that fill the minds of my parents…

Words 784 - Pages 4

Donald Trump Dana Milbank Analysis

Although is is never stated directly, the underlying tone in almost every article Dana Milbank writes makes it possible to infer that he is not a fan of Donald Trump. The majority of articles that Milbank writes contain a negative message about Trump, even if it is not expressed outright. Milbank does not directly state who he voted for, or even that he does not like Trump. Instead, he uses his column to talk about actual issues and how Trump is affecting them. Through his commentary on these…

Words 926 - Pages 4

Poetry and Quote Technique Stanza Essay

perspective, he has superhuman strength ‘His Polish friends/Always shook hands too violently… Horses they bred’ Feliks friends are seen as further sources of acceptance & belonging for Feliks. They share memories reminiscing about fertile farms and animals in their native Poland. The positive connotations of the verbs suggest the immigrants shared nostalgia springing from their common experiences ‘I never got used to’ Peter finds their speech and actions alienating ‘Always shook hands too violently’…

Words 5251 - Pages 22