In Sarah Richard’s article, “The Bitter Truth about Sugar and Its Effect on Our Health”, she explains how sugar has a big impact on our diets and well being. Her argument presents information and explanations as to why sugar is a “demon” in our society. Richards uses many studies and deliberate word choice to persuade her audience effectively.
In the second paragraph, Richards provides studies as evidence. She presents statements from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration expressing “the 16 percent that Americans consume on average” of their total calories is from sugar intake. This evidence adds to the argument by using facts that are undeniable. It induces the audience to think about their own diets and what contributes to that sixteen percent. For the first time in a decade, this organization proposed to change food labels to show the amount of sugar added during the production process (Richards). Also given was the alleged report from the Union of Concerned Scientists, which speculates that food and beverage manufacturers that produce sweeteners have been broadcasting misinformation in order to mask the harmful health risks. This information is incredibly valuable to Richard’s …show more content…
Why I Say No!”, blog article, the main element lacking from Richard’s article is personal experiences. As seen in Konie’s literary work, majority of it is based on personal opinion and involvement. This can allow the reader to relate and agree. The audience can be persuaded with stories that are cordial and entertaining. But the obstacle with this component is that not everyone can relate. There is no assurance that the readers will agree with those personal opinions or relate to those stories. The reason why Richard’s work is more effective is because facts apply to everybody. There is proof to her examples and cited studies. The information she is using is substantive and irrefutable to all human