As you may know, extreme adventures have been increasingly popular. However, this popularity has come with extreme risks for the participants. Although you may disagree, people should participate in extreme adventures because,"Jordan Romero,13, Summits Everest:How is too young,"Dust and Bones,"and"Climber had to Cut Off Arm to Save Life." The evidence presented shows that extreme adventures are worth the risk because they accomplished achievements. On the contrary, others believe that extreme adventures aren't worth the risk because they could die, they get injured, and they risk rescuers life's. While every sport has certain dangers, extreme sports athletes are at an increased risk of serious injuries. It can be argued that death is a possibility when participating in any sport. Especially this happens when people do not use special equipment which in erotically situations can save their lives.…show more content… People can acquire something by working hard for it. In the article,"Jordan Romero,13, Summits Everest," people are astonished a teen reached Mt. Everest." Additionally, in the video "Free Soloing with Alex Honnold." He is the best free soloing because he could climb without gear. In addition, participating in extreme adventures can get you fame. There has been people that make extreme videos many people can't do. In the video "Felix Baumgartners Super Sonic free fall," sets a world record for free falling. Felix is the first man to free fall from space. Furthermore, in the article "The Man Who Climbed Highest," was the first man to survive Mt. Everest. Sir Edmund Hillary became a celebrity, touring the world and making speeches. The evidence presented demonstrates that extreme adventures are worth the risk because you can get
