The 8th amendment protects offenders against “cruel and unusual punishment” and the court decided that executing juvenile offenders falls under “cruel and unusual punishment”. In order to come to the decision that it did the court used several different cases as precedent. The first case that was reviewed was Thompson v. Oklahoma (1988). Thompson was originally being charged with murder and was given the death penalty at the age of 15. After appealing to the U.S Supreme Court Thompson was granted certiorari. The rulings of the Supreme Court were that executing a juvenile under the age of 16 was a violation of the 8th and 14th amendment. Therefore, his cases was reversed and sent back to a lower court for resentencing. In Thompson’s case the plurality opinion stated that executing a person under the age of 16 would offend the current civilized standards of decency. The plurality also pointed out the fact that juveniles should not be held to adult standards just like they are not held to adult privileges and responsibilities. Another case that was reviewed was Stanford v. Kentucky (1989). In Stanford v. Kentucky, Kevin Stanford was charged with first degree murder, sodomy, robbery, and having stolen property. Stanford appealed his conviction to the Supreme Court arguing that the death sentence penalty on a person of his age violated constitutional rights. The Supreme Court held that executing juveniles under the age of 18 was not a violation of constitutional rights. The Supreme Court came to this conclusion by reviewing the number of states that allowed executions for 16 and 17 year old. Based on the numbers the court stated that there was no unified national consensus in regards to the death penalty sentence on 16 and 17 year olds. However, in 2005 the