Rorschach Inkblot Summary

The Rorschach inkblot test has been controversial since its creation by Dr. Hermann Rorschach. There has been many arguments about whether or not it’s valid. In the text, “What’s in an Inkblot? Some Say Not Much,” author Erica Goode conveys the conflicting points of view in the text by remaining unbiased in her response, citing evidence from other articles and scientific research, and quoting statistics.

One way Erica Goode conveys conflicting points in the article is by remaining unbiased. In the article “What’s in an Inkblot? Some Say Not Much,” author Erica Goode it says, “Dr. Lilienfeld and his colleagues argue, for example, that there is "virtually no evidence" that the Rorschach can accurately diagnose depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder or some other emotional problems, calling into question the test's usefulness in custody hearings or as a diagnostic tool …show more content…
In the article “What’s in an Inkblot? Some Say Not Much,” author Erica Goode, she cites,”In an article to be published in the journal American Psychologist, Dr. Meyer and other researchers conclude that the validity of psychological tests, including the Rorschach and the T.A.T., is comparable to that of medical tests, like ultrasounds and M.R.I.'s.” This evidence shows that Erica Goode used information from another valid scientific article to support the argument. Erica Goode also use information from a book written by a expert. In the text it says,” Psychologists like Dr. Weiner, the author of "Principles of Rorschach Interpretation" and another book on the test, strongly disputed the conclusions drawn in the review.” This shows that she related the book to one side of the argument to help convey the conflicting sides. Erica Goode used information from other people research to help strengthen her use of conveying the messages from both

Show More

Related Documents: Rorschach Inkblot Summary

Essay about Psychology Workbook