First question is what makes a rule utilitarian? Well according to Nathanson “Rule utilitarian’s adopt a two-part view that stresses the importance of moral rules. According to rule utilitarian’s, a) a specific action is morally justified if it conforms to a justified moral rule; and b) a moral rule is justified if …show more content…
By “happiness” Mill means pleasure and the absence of pain. He grants however, that some pleasure is more worthwhile than others (Pg. 114).” The difference between rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism is that in act utilitarianism they look the individual action to see if it is morally acceptable so it produces pleasure, where in rule utilitarianism we look to see the evaluation of the rules that are placed in society whether socially or by legislature to see if those who accept these rules will produce the most utility. What this means is that when these people obey these rules we see if they will produce pleasure. We see utility as a moral rule that we must follow because we would not want someone