Russia: Nicholas Ii of Russia and World War Essay

Submitted By YourMajesty1

Words: 398

Pages: 2

Open Document

February 1917 was a massive upheaval for the people of Russia, especially in Petrograd. For years tension had been brewing due to the effects of many different aspects of life in Russia, like the personality of the Tsar and the inconsistency of the Duma. There was also the impact of the years of 1906-1914, and also, maybe most importantly the effects of World War One on Russia. All this led to what is widely referred to as a revolution, but how far should the First World War be responsible for the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty?

The Revolution was triggered by protests with the Industrial Working Class, which stemmed not only from the rumours about the lack of bread, but also from the effects of the 1905 'Revolution' and the impact of 1906-14, which is responsible for a lot of tension and resentment within the country. This period of time produced many long-term problems that made a revolution highly likely even without the outbreak of war.

Before this period, the industrial spurt had offered modernisation to Russia, but could not progress as there was no political or economic commitment to change, showing that the attitude of the Government to reform was hostile and the counter reforms of Alexander II's policies were more favourable. This state of mind was still present after the 1905 'Revolution', even with the economic policies of Witte and Stolypin, and the introduction of the Duma producing important advances. However, the Russian public still had reason for unrest as the Tsarist system was oppressive and

Cold War: Hierarchism, Socialism And Communism

Historic Progression and Cold War The history of the world has witnessed a number of phenomenal upsurges and revolutions based on economic, political, social and scientific objectives. Many of these revolutions were weaved by the military strikes and bloodshed of civilians, while others focused on the enlightenment and intellectual uplifting of masses. Revolutions like enlightenment and industrial revolutions were spread on almost a century whereas the French revolution and upheaval in France lasted…

Words 914 - Pages 4

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? Essay

Why was Nicholas the II Forced to Abdicate? 1917 saw the February revolution, the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the end of 300 years of Romanov rule and centuries of a Tsarist regime ruling Russia. The reasons why Nicholas II was forced to abdicate can be explained in terms of beliefs, such as Nicholas II belief in autocracy, circumstances, such as world war one, and actions, such as Nicholas’ decision to take direct control of the armed forces. In this essay I will be arguing that circumstances…

Words 1449 - Pages 6

Tsar Essay

Tsar Nicholas II The Tsar crowned as supreme ruler of Russia was in need of a new face, so in 1894 a new Tsar was crowned. Nicholas II became the new Tsar of Russia and was praised by many peasants upon his crowning, often referred to as ‘The Little Father of Russia’ he was seen as the saviour of the country but later throughout his reign he would be seen as a weak leader and a failure to the people. His upbringing would cause him to not agree with the necessary change and reform that the people…

Words 1011 - Pages 5

Peter The Great Imperialism

As is the case with Russia in the present day, Imperial Russia was able to maintain an expansionist policy while negating the rights of the common people due to the chauvinistic support that it received from its military prowess. The Russian Empire starts with Peter the I, who paved the way for the Russian Tsar’s having absolute authority that was tolerated due to the continued success of their military conquests. Peter desired for Russia to gain access to the Baltic Sea as this would connect the…

Words 2154 - Pages 9

The Decline Of The Romanov Dynasty

World War 1 played a very significant role in the decline and collapse of the Romanov dynasty. They had been in danger of revolution before the war began, but this event was too much for the Tsar and the people of Russia to handle. Although this wasn’t the only factor that impacted on the downfall of Nicholas Tsar’s autocratic reign, he also failed to increase the support of peasants, when the Tsar was absent from Russia living conditions and supplies began to decline. He also left his wife Alexandra…

Words 1075 - Pages 5

Russian Revolution Research Paper

People Czar Nicholas II Czar Nicholas II came to power in 1894. He believed in his father, Alexander III’s, belief that absolute power of the tsars should be preserved. However Nicholas II lacked the vision and responsibility required of a leader. Nicholas II allowed many of his decisions to be heavily controlled by his wife, Alexandra, and a peasant named Rasputin. Rasputin was able to stop their hemophiliac son from bleeding so Alexandra and Nicholas trusted everything Rasputin…

Words 1824 - Pages 8

February Revolution Essay examples

How far was Russia’s role in World War One responsible for the February Revolution and the collapse of tsardom in 1917? (Consider all short and long term factors in your response.) There have not been many instances in history which were so significant not only for the national situation but also for the events being played on international scene as the February Revolution in Russia. As far as outcomes are concerned, the end of Tsardom as one of them, historians are quite in agreement. However…

Words 1605 - Pages 7

Russia's Autocracy In Russia

At the turn of the twentieth century, Russia remained one of the few countries in the world under autocratic rule. This meant that the Tsar held almost unlimited authority over the country, and “granted the population no voice in government and severely punished any expressions of discontentment with the status quo” (Pipes, 18). In order to rule such a system effectively, it would require an autocrat not only in name but in personality, “someone who enjoyed the prerogatives of power and knew how…

Words 1113 - Pages 5

Nicolas Ii Downfall Oct Halfterm Essay

Jessica Genockey Monday, 1 December y How far was Nicholas II responsible for his own downfall? Tsar Nicholas was to a great extent responsible for his own downfall, the main factor being his decision to take over as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces during World War One. Russia was economically and socially ill-prepared for war and the effects and the outcome of the war had a devastating impact upon the Russian people. There had been a continual build-up of discontent towards the Tsar as…

Words 2710 - Pages 11

Romanov Dynasty Research Paper

The development of opposition to the Romanov Dynasty before 1914 was a build-up over time of the Romanov Dynasty and Tsar Nicholas II’s rule. It was a build-up of tension and repression amongst the Russian people. Russia at the time was made mostly of peasants living in poverty, and made up 80% of the population of Russia and only had 20% of the nation’s wealth. The nobility and Tsar’s family had most of the nation’s wealth. The Tsar’s family and nobility, including the Orthodox church, shared a…

Words 1697 - Pages 7