The courts heavily relied on this concept, which allowed afflicted individuals to testify that they had seen apparitions of the accused tormenting them. This type of evidence lacked a basis and was purely subjective as it depended on the perceptions and imaginations of the alleged victims. Accepting evidence resulted in unjust convictions because the accused had no way to defend themselves against such intangible and unverifiable claims. The trials demonstrated a disregard for due process rights that are essential, in any fair legal system. Defendants often find themselves without representation, making it challenging for them to navigate the legal process. Should a person be found guilty of witchcraft, their punishment would be imprisonment, and repeat offenders would be executed (Hoffer pg. 147-149).