What is the difference between a'smart' and a'smart'? The SARS-CoV-1 outbreak in Toronto had a major impact on medical professionals, and the authorities' design and execution of quarantines during this public health emergency were heavily influenced by economic considerations. The economic effects of the quarantine measures that were put in place were both planned and unexpected, and their objectives were not always fully met. The effect on businesses and tourists was one economic aspect that influenced quarantine plans during the SARS outbreak. According to York University professor Harris S. Ali, there were large financial losses as a result of the closing of Toronto's Chinatowns and the sharp fall in tourism: “In the meantime, the city’s three Chinatowns remained deserted, while the occupancy rate in Toronto hotels fell dramatically with the cancellation of several international conferences and a plummeting decline in tourists.” (Ali, Canadian Ethnic Studies, 45). Authorities tried to strike a compromise between public health concerns and the city's economic interests, which likely had a large impact on their judgments on the extent and duration of quarantine measures. The financial strain on healthcare institutions and employees is another economic factor to take into account. Healthcare personnel's psychological trauma during the SARS pandemic was severe, which reflects both the toll it took on their health and their productivity: “The severity of the psychological …show more content…
What is the difference between a.. The Typhoid Mary case demonstrates how new scientific knowledge and disease transmission assumptions influenced the establishment of quarantines or isolation measures in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. During this time, scientists like Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch produced ground-breaking research that significantly changed medical knowledge of infectious diseases, as historian Judith Walzer Leavitt states: By the last decades of the century, the experimental work from the laboratories of Louis Pasteur in France and Robert Koch in Germany had revolutionized medical theory about the causes of epidemic disease, substituting microorganisms for undifferentiated filth as the culprit. Leavitt, Typhoid Mary, 23. Before the late 19th century, prevalent views concerning the causation of epidemic disease blamed epidemics on undifferentiated filth and poor sanitation. However, Pasteur and Koch's experimental work transformed medical thought by pinpointing microbes as the major cause of infectious diseases. A result of this new knowledge was the identification of healthy carriers: people who had a certain type of disease without showing any symptoms but were still able to infect others: "Chapin emphasized a new worry that had been uncovered by recent bacteriological studies: the risk posed by healthy carriers, people who themselves were not sick but who could nonetheless infect others." Leavitt, Typhoid Mary, 25. This idea, as revealed by