Science Vs Religion Research Paper

Words: 2219
Pages: 9

The origin of religious beliefs was pre-scientific. The people of those times had little or no understanding of the natural processes such as, sun-rise, rain fall, earthquake, thunderstorm, and so on. Those pre-scientific people believed in a magic world. They performed rituals and prayed to god for the things they desired. Naturally, whatever they could not explain was attributed to god. In contrary, it is science that discovered the natural phenomenon and solved the mysteries. It is science that has opened our eyes and rewarded the knowledge of nature and life, and theories regarding many of natural phenomena. What is the alternative of science and of humanity? Blind faith is just for personal satisfaction, without thinking in the matters …show more content…
The matter of fact is that science continues to progress but there are still lots of unknowns that scientists have to search for answers. On the other hand, religion needs to create a widely acceptable environment in which people can find the complete and meaningful life. In religion, end justifies the means. Science is an ever-green area of knowledge, where the unknown become known in a gradual process. One may argue that science is in its infancy; it is never ending but not complete. There is no denial of this fact. Religions need to be open, dynamic, creative, and enjoyable, rather than static, compulsive and fearful to the lives of people. Only then there is a possibility that scientific knowledge can be flourished in religions. Rev. Howard Bess (2015) hopes that life will be fun, enjoyable and rich when religious people and scientists are on the same dance floor. Does anyone hope this to happen? If so when? These are the open …show more content…
A. Powell Davies has explained this subject in a different perspective. According to him, science must enter into the field of religion, or religion must get into the field of science. He states that religion must be liberal, may be termed as liberal-religion, and it must maintain the open mindedness towards future discovery. It should not be restricted by a creed. In other words, when a new knowledge comes, religion must accept it and take the consequences of it. This suggests that religion should accept the advancing truth, and accommodate all knowledge and wisdom, and always try to know what experience justifies. Only with this kind of liberalism in religion science can meet with religion. Only this kind of religion can keep the door open to scientific advancement without barriers imposed by religious doctrines. This in turn suggests that when scientists go along with religion, without abandoning their scientific disciplines, they cannot accept a traditional creed as binding. Scientists want a free field without church’s interference, and a free and open religion so that they can openly pursue their intellects. It would be rejoicing if traditional denominations would allow this freedom not only to scientists but also to others as