Second Amendment Argumentative Analysis

Imagine this: You're walking down the city street when there's a loud boom and people are screaming and running for their lives. The parade you were walking to just witnessed a mass shooting. You, as well as so many other people, are witnesses of a mass shooting. This is just one of the many shootings that happen every year. In recent years, the debate over new gun laws for safety has intensified. Advocates push for stricter regulations to reduce gun violence, while opponents emphasize Second Amendment rights. Finding a balance between these perspectives remains challenging. Because the Second Amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns, adding more gun laws would prevent deaths, and the presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to …show more content…
For starters, the Second Amendment was made to enforce the right of militias to own guns, not for individuals to own and use guns. Former Justice John Paul Stevens, in his opinion for DC et al. v. Heller, talked about how the 2nd Amendment was made only for the use of military and militias (procon.org). This suggests that there may be room for more regulation on individual gun ownership, as the Second Amendment may not necessarily provide an absolute right to own and use firearms. Additionally, in a 7-4 decision on June 9, 2016, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a law in California that mandates a permit and a "good cause" for obtaining a concealed carry license. The court stated that the Second Amendment has never protected the public's right to carry concealed firearms in public, as stated by procon.org. This shows that there is precedent for laws that regulate the carrying of firearms in public and that the Second Amendment does not necessarily protect an individual's right to carry concealed firearms. purely, the second Amendment is not an unlimited or individual right to own …show more content…
According to procon.org, Armed civilians are unlikely to prevent crimes and are more likely to escalate dangerous situations, including mass shootings leading to greater harm. None of the 62 mass shootings between 1982 and 2012 were brought to a halt by an armed civilian. This suggests that the presence of armed civilians does not effectively prevent mass shootings or other crimes. Instead, it indicates that armed civilians may potentially escalate dangerous situations, leading to greater harm. Moreover, statistics indicate that firearms are seldom used for self-defense. Out of 29,618,300 violent crimes recorded between 2007 and 2011, only 0.79% of victims (235,700) employed a firearm for self-protection, making it the least utilized protective measure (procon.org).The statistics show that firearms are rarely used for self-defense, comprising only 0.79% of cases from 2007 to 2011. This suggests that firearms don't significantly contribute to self-defense, and tighter regulations could reduce overall violence. Although some people think having a gun increases safety, more gun control laws would reduce gun

Show More

Related Documents: Second Amendment Argumentative Analysis

Second Amendment Argumentative Analysis

Argumentative Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Letter From Birmingham