Due to our modern expectation of art it can make it difficult as to what art can be considered. In my eyes are I assume the eyes of those who are in favour of the Neanderthals cognitively being capable of art is the expression of feeling and passion. This is attainable in many ways. In a cave in France’s Loire Valley an artifact was found, a piece of rock that had resemblance of a human or Neanderthal face (Chao: Abstract). For many, this was a further confirmation of cognitive appearance in the Neanderthals life. Others like zoo archaeologist Nerissa Russell was stubborn claiming that just because their resemblance doesn’t make it a face (Chao: Abstract). Despite her probable bias against cognitive advance in Neanderthals she is ignoring the notion that a person from the Neanderthal species intended to create marks on a piece of rock. Putting biases aside, it is hard to ignore the fact of intent of creation. In modern day there are tones of art that is considered “trash” and some art work literally uses trash to create modern art! If a pile of trash is considered art, how could it be looked over that a rock with engravings in it isn’t? Findings like this rock engraving is just the beginning of these findings of Neanderthal art. A further example is panting and or engravings in Gibraltar. In Gibraltar