The argument from the other side I have chosen is: Semi-automatic rifles, without modification, do more damage than the vast majority of other, legal guns, without modification. According to “Conceding to N.R.A., Trump Abandons Brief Gun Control Promise.” This article was written by the New york times authors “ Michael D. Shear and Sheryl Gay Stolberg.” “President Trump on Monday abandoned his promise to work for gun control measures opposed by the National Rifle Association, bowing to the gun group and embracing its agenda of armed teachers and incremental improvements to the background check system.” The evidence above contradicts the other side’s argument because the other side’s argument explains that the government and the president were trying to help with gun control. But according to this quote they don’t even care at all. This is the primary source for New york times is known for having primary sources.…show more content… First, his own ATF agency has warned that it does not have the authority to ban bump stocks. The only way to close this loophole permanently is legislation." This quote was written in an article called “5 things congress could do with guns.” The 5 things congress could do with guns article was written by CNN politics by the author Daniella Diaz.Another quote by Daniella Diaz is "There are serious problems with the President's approach. First, his own ATF agency has warned that it does not have the authority to ban bump stocks. The only way to close this loophole permanently is
