He says that “every white man’s life in the East was one long struggle not to be laughed at,” that “when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys,” and that the imperialist “becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib.” Orwell’s essay, however, is more than one person’s riveting narrative about the beginning of an awareness. “Shooting an Elephant” captures a universal experience of going against one’s own humanity at the cost of a part of that humanity. This that’s how this story also discuss how doing an ethical or an unethical choice can different from opposing sides in this cases Orwell did not want to shoot the elephant to not be cruel and the people wanted the elephant dead because of how he/it murdered one of them and how they could gain on the elephants death materialistically. Of course the consequences the decision brought was that Orwell was not the laughing stock of the area and the harmless animal was killed. This shows us the magnitude of an ethical decision or in the case an unethical