The death penalty has been and continued to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated all around the world for many years to come. In America, the death penalty is the one of the most important issue. The history shows us that that the death penalty has been used since ancient times for variety of offenses. I remember from the readings, the moment when the trial decided to give the capital punishment to their king on January 21, 1793. The government has different ways how it punishes the criminals according to their crime. It applies the death penalty for crimes: treason, terrorism, federal murder, large scale drug trafficking. …show more content…
Kaur is one of them who opposes the lethal injection because are some problems that make it more difficult. "The way a body dies [in a lethal injection] is from lack of oxygen to the tissues, causing them to stop functioning," Dr. DiCapua said. But the drugs must be administered correctly in order to be effective. The drug, midazolam, is just the latest to fall under scrutiny as more and more of the drugs used in the death penalty become unavailable, pulled from sale to prisons by manufacturers who don't want their products associated with execution. Those are the reasons why doctors are asking or better are searching for different methods less painful of execution and I agree with …show more content…
Some will say that they did make a crime and they have to pay by the worst method. The life is a war. Most of the people will say “an eye for an eye”. Why we have to make them the death less painful, when they did our lives miserable taking from us our people? A doctor is a doctor and when you accept capital punishment in principle means, you accept it in practice. So you are accepting their practical consequences. If one finds the practice too brutal, one must either reject it in principle or to continue with brutality. According to the protection, against cruel and unusual punishment the presence of the doctor is