Should Prescribe Fires Be Allowed

Words: 436
Pages: 2

There are many benefits of having prescribe fires. Many people argue over if prescribe fires should be allowed or if they should not be allowed. Some say that prescribe fires can transform into much larger fires causing a bigger problem. However, prescribed fires should be allowed because it stops larger fires form happening, it also helps the environment, and wildlife. This shows that the good things about prescribe fires outweigh the bad tings.

There is a lot of debate over if there should be prescribe fires or not. One of the reasons why there should be prescribe fires is because it prevents larger fires from happening. A website named Fire and Aviation Management talks about how prescribe fires reduces fires. For example, the website states, " The right fire at the right place and time reduces hazardous fuels, protecting human communities from extreme fires." This proves how prescribe fires help prevent more dangerous and larger fires from happening.

There are also various ways prescribe fires help the environment. The website Bouldercolorado.gov gives examples of how prescribe fires help the environment . The website says," When excess vegetation or needle layers are burned off, nitrogen and other nutrients are released into the soil and become available for new plants to grow." In addition,
…show more content…
For example, the first website says," It improves habitat for threatened and endangered species." The second website also states,"Fire creates a varied land and vegetation pattern that provides diverse habitat for plants and animals." In contrast, some people may think that wildlife is not safe because of the probability of prescribe fires changing into larger fires. Although, the whole point of prescribe fires is to prevent more dangerous and deadly fires from happening. In addition, these examples show how prescribe fires can be really