An argument that seeks to create a link between smoking and cancer should be strong, convincing, and one that engages concrete examples. The argument that seeks to create a link between smoking and cancer should be strong in such a way that it incorporates renowned people who have vast knowledge on the effects of smoking to explain to people how regular smoking puts one at the risk of acquiring cancer. The experts should relate their arguments …show more content…
Critics may argue that smoking does not cause cancer considering the fact that some people have been smoking for many years without showing any signs of cancer. The opposing group may argue that the idea that smoking causes cancer is misleading and only based on the belief of a few individuals. The opposing group may even go ahead to argue that every person has the right to determine their lifestyles including whether to smoke or not. The added argument would certainly have adverse effects on the argument that seeks to link smoking to cancer development because the audience will find it difficult to believe either