Sociological theories of crime are only one factor when deciding on social order. Sociologist research is those that use social context and social pressures to explain anti-social characteristics within a theoretical approach. For instance, Conservative approach emphasises that lower classes are social groups heavily involved in criminal activities, and Radical approaches state crime as a response to some form of economic deprivation (Bourke, 2013, pp. 36-45; 262-277).
The conservative’s fundamental idea roots the cause of crime to be a biological and poor socialisation as people make rational decisions to commit a crime. Therefore, the ideal solution would be to employ a more formal organised crime, like harsher punishment, …show more content…
For instance, Edwin Sutherland credentials for discovering a theory about white collar crime, crimes committed by office workers (middle or upper class) are hidden from public view. Like corporate crimes are carried out on behalf of a company, for example, tax evasion, or occupational crimes made at the expense of businesses, as to fraud (Bessant et al., 2007, pp. 425-427). Even though Marxist unclearly defined the white collar crime, his compliance towards misconduct committed by ruling class, as to white collars scapegoats the underclass (Lugo, 2013, p. 12). As to the perspective of studying criminology of white collar crime, it seems to appear class bias. Therefore, the facts of white collar crime can be an enormous task because of the powerfulness and wealth of those involved.
Overall, conservatives agree with radicalistic, that the police can only do so much, so there needs to be more informal social control. For instance, to deal with the deeper structural causes of crime by reducing inequality by creating job opportunities and improve quality housing. As a result, the improvement of policing and social control will gain the confidence of local