Stalin's Three Main Points Of Contradict Communism

Words: 955
Pages: 4

Soviet State
The wars of the 19th century lead us into one of the greatest reevaluation. World War One, World War Two, the Great Depression, and the Holocaust helped to lead people into realizing that monarchy was not beneficial. Instead of looking to the people to help correct the state the world had fallen into, everyone just kept looking for some type of king (monarchy) to lead them into safety and stability. The Soviet Union made some of the most changes, hoping to end violence and build unity, however, loyalty and trust were rapidly declining due to the massive destruction and casualties. Absolute monarchy lead to some of the worlds worst and most devastating wars.
Looking back at the wars and state of the world during the 1900s we see
…show more content…
One of his tactics was to challenge the ideas between Trotsky and Lenin. Stalin claims that Trotskyism has three main points that contradict Leninism. “Trotskyism is a theory of ‘permanent’ (uninterrupted) revolution … it is a distrust of the Bolshevik Party principle (as the ability to form smaller groups who could co-exist) … and a distrust of the Bolshevik leaders” (Stalin). Stalin’s goal in this was to show how unstable these ideas were and the ideas put in place when Lenin was still incontrol. By 1927 stalin had taken the rein. He had convinced the society that his was would lead them into freedom and expansion, but they had little idea what they cost might be. In the end, Trotsky was exiled to Mexico, but before he could get there, Stalin had him …show more content…
The deadliest war had been fought and nearly fifty-million men and women lost their lives. The Soviet Union fought hard and long until Stalin felt that things were justified. However, these were not just wars. This were people's lives, homes, lands, and cities at stake. The Soviet Union is just one of the many examples of absolute monarchy in the nineteenth century. Absolute monarchy does not always work, often it fails its people. People in leadership rapidly expand, but then realize they have too much to handle on their own. They try to fix this by hiring more help, but often they are not the best candidates. After WW2, the United States and the Soviet Union would end up in the Cold War. Absolute monarchy and the lack of knowledge of leaders laid the foundation to both of the