Standardized State Testing

Words: 1004
Pages: 5

About 75% of the teachers would give greater emphasis to basic skills instructions, word recognition skills, if there were no mandated tests. State testing should not be mandatory because,it is an unreliable measure of a student's performance in school. Preparing students to take standardized state testing will not produce higher test scores. Teachers and students stress about state testing, then rather teaching students what they need to know and prepare for. Standardized testing has not improved students achievement. Standardized state testing has taken over our schools and precipitated a wide variety of spirited actions that are only the beginning of mobilization for real education. In fact, these tests are biased, according to the students …show more content…
Stressing goals often leads to stressed-out people, we believe that schools must set rigolos expectations for all students. Educators can create learning environment in which students feel they belong, have opportunities to grow, can succeed as a result of focused effort and see value and purpose in their work. For example, a long-term analysis of subjects from Robert Mischel’s famous marshmallow study showed that children with strong self-regulation, is a better predictor of school success than intelligence in tests. However, traditional grading policies are entirely inconsistent with a grown mindset because they often reward students for what they already know and can do rather; than encouraging further effort and recognition of one’s progress (Dockterman). Students feel that doing well on standardized tests and rewarding them on skills that students already learned is a waste of time. Students’ belief in their ability be successful improves when schools that allow them to experience success. We must move beyond tired old rules such as “students may not complete missing work and make-up tests (Dockterman).” Instead, we must find ways to require students to improve upon initial work, such as when teachers assign students to assess and revise their writing projects, instead of stressing about …show more content…
A general acceptance on the part of educators and the community that tests can not accurately measure academic achievement (Lam).The popularity of students achievement have lowered due to state testing. Once test scores have become numbers in file, they provide basis for high-stakes decisions concerning, selection placement , and promotion. They are made without consideration of inequalities imposed by the original testing situation (Lam). Students tend to worry about their test scores on standardized state testing ,and teachers worry about students achievement and performance on the state testing. This misuse standardized achievement testing not only affects the individual student’s well being, but also undermines the validity of these test scores as measures of performance of the educational system itself (Lam). Not only does state testing affects teachers ,but the educational system as well. Student performance on standardized are affected by number of factors and units in the educational community. Teachers, schools, districts, and the nation play a big role in educational community (Walberg 1980). In considering, the new concept of testability addresses the aforementioned issues the misapplication of standardized testing of language- minority students. It provides a new perspective; an standardized achievement testing of