Stereotypes In Twelve Angry Men

Words: 646

Pages: 3

Open Document

The play Twelve Angry Men shows us how everyone looks at a situation differently. How each person looks at an issue and biases it on their past. Everybody goes through things or is thought things as they grow up and it sticks with you, especially your personal experiences. Also there are stereotypes associated with each race or culture which make people think of one another differently. Many people who live in a neighborhood with predominantly one race and is attacked by someone of another race may begin to look down upon that race. In this play Jurors three, five, and eleven all have a different way of looking at this case. In juror threes case he looks at this case and relates it to his personal experience of his son attacking him. This leads him to believe that if his son could do that to him why couldn't this child kill his own father. This makes it really hard to convince him to look at this case with logic and facts instead of bringing his own personal life into it. As you can tell him that experience must have made a big impact on juror three because he was extremely stubborn and only changed his decision because he was the only one left and was technically forced to. Juror five looks at this case with a different view because he feels as if he relates to the boy and his situation. He himself grew up in slums and had a really rough …show more content…
He was the immigrant and was so happy to be in this country and wanted to rightfully use his rights of democracy. He believed they were given a sacred job to choose whether a person would live or die and couldn't take this right lightly. He always spoke up even when someone changed their vote in the secret ballot. He knows what it's like to live without these rights and looks into every detail of the case before making his decision and also gets angry at juror seven who chose whatever side and told them to take this responsibility

Juror 3 seems simple - TAM Essay

first Juror 3 seems to be a simple character, but is in fact the most complicated. In Reginald Rose’s “Twelve Angry Men”, Juror 3 seems to be a really stubborn, prejudiced, angry man, but in reality he is very experienced and has lived a complicate life. The play takes place in a jury room of a 1950’s murder trial where a young boy has been accused of the murder of his father. It follows the twelve jurors as the deliberate and discuss the case on the hot, stormy summer’s day. Throughout the duration…

Words 908 - Pages 4

Justice In 12 Angry Men

The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose exemplifies the chaos that goes on in the justice system. In this drama, the life of a young teen is placed in the hands of twelve jurors. While analyzing this heart-rending murder case, these men undergo feelings of frustration, rage, and exasperation as they discuss a murder trial. The twelve jurors become frustrated with juror eight because he, initially, is the only person opposed in the decision of the case. The jurors elaborate continue to vote on…

Words 643 - Pages 3

Juror Number Five In Reginald Rose's 'Twelve Angry Men'

In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose and Sherman Sergel, Juror Number Five starts to believe that The Kid is innocent because both him and The Kid grew up in a slum and he has had the same experiences as him, which have convinced his beliefs. In Act One, when the jurors are talking badly about slums, Juror Five chimes in and says, “I've lived in a slum all my life … There is something personal!” (Rose and Sergel 21). Juror Five starts to feel empathy for The Kid because he has shared similar experiences…

Words 416 - Pages 2

Personal Experiences And Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

Personal experiences can affect our feelings and sometimes cause prejudice. In our legal court system the defendant has civil rights which allow him/her to be dealt with impartial hearing. In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose presents us with a case in which a juror feels bad for the culprit which ultimately leads to the jurors declaring him not guilty. I believe that personal feelings are tied into the final fate of that suspect. An example of personal feelings overshadowing the real issue…

Words 477 - Pages 2

12 Angry Men Essay examples

Comm 302 Professor Koteen March 6th, 2013 12 Angry Men Though the movie is out of date compared to the present day it can still relate to what occurs these days in similar group situations. The movie goes through the stages of group development as the plot unfolds. In the movie "Twelve Angry Men," twelve jury members were given the task to decide a boy's fate. The jury members, when beginning deliberation, were almost unanimous on a guilty verdict. All but one man was in favor…

Words 952 - Pages 4

Rugmaker: Juror Essay

in ’12 Angry Men’? Discuss Reginald Rose conveys a tainted society, where truth is contaminated by irrationality and ignorance, and justice is repressed by prejudice and egotistical motive. The fragile bias state of the American Justice System is exploited, and the warped, bigoted condition of society is exposed, as a 1957 New York jury is forced to decide the fate of a young, delinquent on trial for the murder of his hostile father, on a coinciding ‘hot summer afternoon’. ‘Twelve Angry Men’ exhibits…

Words 1258 - Pages 6

Essay Twelve Angry Men

Twelve Angry Men is a movie that was made in 1957 by Reginald Rose based on actual life occurrences of a juror. The movie is about a New York jury that was deliberating after the trial of an 18-year-old Puerto Rican teenager that was accused with murder for stabbing his day to death. If the young man is convicted he could face the death penalty or the electric chair. This play also concerns twelve jurors reaching to the same decision and dealing with multiple different individuals that make up a…

Words 1325 - Pages 6

Essay on 12 Angry Men

Karina Verano Pd. 2B 12 Angry Men 1. Which characters base their decisions on prejudice? Juror number 4 based his decision based on the fact that the boy on trial grew up in the slum. Juror number 4 said, “He was born in a slum. The slum is a breeding ground for criminals. I know it and so do you. It’s no secret that children from slum backgrounds are menaces to society.” While Juror number ten just doesn’t like the boy bases on his race. Throughout the entire movie, he referred to the boy…

Words 1013 - Pages 5

ENC1102 ResearchPaper

Giannino Professor Patriche ENC 1102 December 4, 2014 The Ever-Changing Role of Men and Women Throughout the 1990’s divorce started to increase, and became more common in American households. Kids continue to face the issues of divorce, such as custody, and other complications in finding a compromise amongst parents. In the film “Mrs. Doubtfire,” directed by Chris Columbus, the director shows the stereotypical role of a men and woman in a relationship. Daniel, in order to gain partial custody of his…

Words 1873 - Pages 8

EMVC Essay Analysis done final

incorporated his sfumato; blending the horizon of time and movement, bringing the viewer a more realistic, prolific and life like, scene.5 He may be giving the observer a glance at his own emotional inertia towards the scene, expressed through the twelve sentinel bodies. It is evident that Christ is at the focal point of the image as his arms are spread, encompassing him into a triangular shape, expressive of the Divine Trinity. Due to the asymmetrical symmetry you can see through the copious division…

Words 2600 - Pages 11