My first point of Steven's innocence comes from Steven himself and is then backed by his teacher. O'brien " one last question were you in any way involved with the crime that we are discussing here?" Mr. Harmon " no I was not." O'brien do you consider him an honest young man?" Mr sawicki "Absolutely" he latter said "It is my belief that to make an honest film, one must be an honest person."..."and I do believe in Steve's honesty." Secondly Mrs. Henry states she saw two men grab Mr. Nesbitt. She places king as one and Bobo said he was there too and osvaldo was to be outside, so where was Steven? Well I say to you he was not at the drug store. Finally …show more content…
Evans) testimony, "Then we got the sign from him-" " Petrocelli "Let the record show that mr. Evans is pointing at Mr. Harmon." Where Bobo placed Steven at the store. However this point was discredited when Bobo said he didn't know Steven or the sign he was going to give and that Steven got no money, O'brien " And what was that signal to be?" Bobo "I don't know." He even later says "we decided to lay low." O'brien "who is the "we" who decided to lay low?" Bobo "Me and King".
Earlier in the intro I started Steven was 16 and on trial however he is being tried as an adult (18+) and going to an adult (18+) jail not juve. More important the detectives arrested Steven based of this " Some clown said you were involved with that drugstore stickup just before Christmas." Before I continue let me point out this the detective called the person a clown and because he said clown not clowns we know only one person said he was involved. So i say to you Steven is not only innocent he was also imprisoned off faulty