Stewart Parnell Case

Words: 460
Pages: 2

Former owner of a Georgia Peanut company, Stewart Parnell, was sentenced on Monday to 28 years in prison for his role in a salmonella outbreak. The 2008-2009 salmonella outbreak caused by Parnell’s contaminated peanuts products had killed nine people and sickened more than 700 in 46 states.The Department of Justice found that Parnell had committed to defraud consumers by knowingly shipping salmonella-tainted peanut products across the country. Parnell had approved shipments that were “partially covered with dust and rat feces”. As well as falsifying lab test in order for products to appear safe. Not wanting to lose customers while pending for lab test Parnell had ordered for the products to just be shipped. Knowing full well what he was doing and the risk it imposed. Mold, cockroaches, and dirty equipment were found at the company's processing facilities. The food and drug administration had the company recall every product it had produced since 2007.

CDC estimates that the reported cases in this case about 700 affected and 9 killed were of a small fraction that thousands others were most likely harmed. No one was convicted for the deaths. The judge, Louis Sands, reviewed the case stating that “These acts were driven simply by the desire to profit. This is commonly and accurately referred to as greed.” Parnell was sentenced to 28 years
…show more content…
The sentencing of Stewart Parnell sends a strong message to other food production companies that those who violate the safety of their consumers will face serious consequences. Parnell having had the longest sentencing in a food poisoning case has been a victory for all consumers that have been affected by more than just the George Peanut company. It just so happens that this particular case had clear evidence of fraud and conspiracy. Whereas other company cases have unfortunately had little to no evidence to build a case