CDC estimates that the reported cases in this case about 700 affected and 9 killed were of a small fraction that thousands others were most likely harmed. No one was convicted for the deaths. The judge, Louis Sands, reviewed the case stating that “These acts were driven simply by the desire to profit. This is commonly and accurately referred to as greed.” Parnell was sentenced to 28 years …show more content…
The sentencing of Stewart Parnell sends a strong message to other food production companies that those who violate the safety of their consumers will face serious consequences. Parnell having had the longest sentencing in a food poisoning case has been a victory for all consumers that have been affected by more than just the George Peanut company. It just so happens that this particular case had clear evidence of fraud and conspiracy. Whereas other company cases have unfortunately had little to no evidence to build a case