Stoic Virtue Analysis

Words: 440
Pages: 2

According to Aristotle, virtue belongs in two categories: intellectual and moral. With intellectual virtue, this is conceptualized at birth and grows through teaching, which requires time and experience (Cahn, 2013). Whereas moral virtues ascend from us habitually by nature through adaption (Cahn, 2013). Aristotle continues that nature actions should be determined how they should be done, in order to become good or learn if an action becomes destroyed through a defect or excess of an extreme (Cahn, 2013). In addition, Aristotle stated for a behavior to become habituated, individuals despise things through abstinence so they can stand their ground in regards to the action at hand (Cahn, 2013). When discussing virtues, Aristotle argues just as arts have characters that produce goodness in themselves, they can also be not in accordance if the act is done in a manner that is not just or temperate (Cahn, 2013). In retrospect, an individual that does just acts is produced, whereas, an individual that does temperate acts has the potential of becoming a good person (Cahn, 2013). …show more content…
Gray (2010, summarized that Stoic Virtue Ethics theory in general believe that true moral beliefs and thoughts incline to prompt appropriate feelings and actions. There are five areas that stoic virtues consider to be true:
• Virtue is the ultimate value that overrides all other values;
• Have true evaluative beliefs, emotions based on those evaluative beliefs, and behaving according to those evaluative beliefs (e.g. Pleasure is preferable);
• True evaluative beliefs and thoughts tend to give appropriate feelings and actions (e.g. Positive evaluative beliefs lead to positive emotional