Stop Animal Experimentation Essay

Submitted By ebauer05
Words: 1485
Pages: 6
Open Document
Stop Animal Experimentation The debate for animal rights and stopping experimentation has been going on for decades Animal experimentation throughout the world has become a huge problem. Every year there are millions upon millions of animals used in an attempt to benefit human existence (HOPES). It’s not that I’m against a long life expectancy or having and allergic reaction is my favorite thing to have to deal with I’m just concerned with the well-being of another species. Peter singer is a philosopher from oxford that I will reference throughout this paper in an attempt to defend these innocent animals. There are so many issues surrounding the debate of animal experimentations, to bring up a few issues that lead to many, we can ask ourselves it is ethically and morally “right”, how can we be one hundred percent certain the tests performed on an animal will have the same effects on a human., after all we are not biologically, physically or mentally the same. When conducting an experiment we can only observe reactions to tests. The animal is not able to explain to us what they are experiencing. In my opinion animal experimentation is morally and ethically wrong. So many people want to argue that in order to stop animal experimentations we need to establish rights for animals I agree but I also think that if we could all just establish a good moral behavior towards animals, we would them be able to see how wrong the use of animals in experiments truly is thus hopefully dramatically dropping the numbers used each year in an attempt to hopefully one day end it all together. Last year alone in Britain and the United States over 3 million animals where used in experiments. The animals range from rodents to Gorillas. So I guess we could start by establishing a moral ground. In an attempt to figure out whether animal experimentation is morally right or wrong we could start by determining what moral grounds we have pertaining to animal. Animal ethics helps us when we venture down this train of thought it was designed to helps us to understand how animals and humans should react together .it is obviously hard to establish a moral ground that separates humans from animals. This leaves many people to argue on the simply basis that animals and humans are so obviously different that we have to treat them differently. But how are so obviously different from them? Is it because of our differences in shape, color, intelligence and personality? Or is on a deeper level, focusing on literacy, comprehension, pain or pleasure, or mental capacity? Let’s take a look at the comprehension aspect. Many people believe that animals are sentient creatures who feel pain pleasure and emotions. Most people can also come to the consciences that animals don’t need the same rights as humans; the need to vote, or have freedom of speech, but this should not stop us giving them a relevant form of protection. But there are some people who think that only creatures who comprehend rights can benefit from them, thus leaving animals out of the picture. But if this were the case then we would not give children and mentally disabled people rights because they cannot understand them. But as a society we do not hold these rights back, therefore we should do the same for animals (HOPES). Peter singer wrote a book called “Animal Liberation” that uses children and mentally disabled people as a defending argument as well. This book describes how using mental capacity to determine animal rights is discriminating. He uses the word specism, which is the discrimination on the grounds that a being belongs to a certain species. He believes that the interests of all beings that are capable of suffering should be worthy of equal consideration, and that giving lesser consideration to beings based on their species is no more justified than discrimination based on skin color.(Singer) In particular, he argues that while animals show lower intelligence than the average
Show More

Related Documents: Stop Animal Experimentation Essay

Essay about Testing Animals

Scientists should seek different alternatives to animal experimentation. Science and technology has had so many advances in recent years, that there must be other alternatives that allow animal testing to stop being necessary. Options such as experimentation on human stem cells may be a way to experiment without hurting and killing animals. Another option is the creation of computers or robots that would have the ability to simulate human reactions to products or chemicals substances. People just…

Words 467 - Pages 2

Essay Animal Testing and Experimentation

discussed, whether or not animals should be used for scientific experimentation. More than 2.5 million live animal experiments were authorized in Great Britain in 2000. This number has halved since the 1970s (Animal Port). Yet many protest groups and activist have arisen to try and put an end to the use of animals in scientific experimentation. The problem with this is that they don’t realize how much it has helped us over the years. Even though many people disagree I support animal testing because it is…

Words 639 - Pages 3

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Experimentation

heard the name of “Animal liberation front”? This front in UK has raided animal research facilities, carried out arson attacks and planted car bombs even, only to stop the animal experimentation, which in their language is to prevent the cruelty to animals. The debate about animal experimentation in scientific researches is hotting up. Numerous associations are completing exercises to stop the utilization of creatures and to tighten up the laws that direct such experimentation. However, as per academic…

Words 850 - Pages 4

Commercial Testing Vs Animal Testing Essay

Animal Testing or Animal Wasting? Every year, more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. Living, breathing creatures are being tortured, starved, and violated for human benefit. The animals are deprived of everything natural in its’ life. Animal testing should not be allowed because it is cruel and inhumane, does not faithfully translate to humans, and it violates animals’…

Words 500 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

of Stanford University. Animal testing is an experimentation carried out on animals. Animal experimentation is used to advance scientific understanding, develop and test potential form of treatments and medication, and is also used as models to study diseases. Animal testing is definitely unnecessary because it is cruel and inhumane, extremely expensive, and inaccurate science. First of all animal testing is completely unnecessary because it is cruel and inhumane. Animal testing is killing over…

Words 474 - Pages 2

Animals Should Not Be Used For Animal Testing

In the field of medical research, there has been a rising discussion on the experimentation methods using animals. Many major discoveries have changed the medical field including antibiotics, insulin, vaccines for polio and cervical cancer; but there has been controversy on how these discoveries have been made. Many people believe that it is essential to use animals to research different drugs or chemicals to find the cause or cure to a disease, to make sure that the drug or cure is safe to use before…

Words 1785 - Pages 8

Bioethics Paper

Animal Experimentation: Is it Cruelty or the Key to Advancing and Bettering our Future? Jasmine L. Smith Southeastern University March 6, 2014 Abstract Testing on animals has been around for centuries but recently it has become a highly argued bioethical issue. It has become a question of where our commitment lies; to the safety and health of other humans, or to the welfare and rights of animals. Debates between animal welfare advocates and organizations that use animal testing have…

Words 4626 - Pages 19

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay

Pictures of little animals with lipstick and other make-up applied to their cute faces, upset more and more people. Experiments on animals has been a hot topic issue. Is enough medical advancement made from these experiments enough to justify the use of animals? In March of 2015, Nobel laureate J.M. Coetzee and more than 150 other experts publish a comprehensive report on animal experimentation by the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics that concludes that the practice is ¨ unthinkable" and that…

Words 575 - Pages 3

Animal Abuse Senior Paper

Animal Abuse By Jordan Froce English IV Period: 2 Mrs. Zoltani 9 April 2010 Jordan Froce Mrs. Zoltani English IV 3 March 2010 Animal Rights Thesis Statement: Imagine a dog running to fetch a toy, A horse galloping on a trail, or even a heard of cows grazing upon a grassy pasture. These same beloved animals could be suffering an unimaginable fate in some of the world concentration camps that are still standing. Only nowadays they are known to the outside world as slaughterhouses…

Words 1722 - Pages 7

Science and Animal Experimentation Essay

Jimmy Roberts, 1 Animal Experimentation Whether supported or not, experiments done on animals have be ongoing for the last century. There is one significant reason as to why animals have been used for research and testing the unknown. Animal research has played a vital role in virtually every major medical advance of the last century- for both human and animals (Trull, 2002). The majority of knowledge pertaining to biological health issues of humans and animals such as surgery, cure of…

Words 379 - Pages 2