Strong Central Government

Words: 779
Pages: 4
Open Document
Do We Need a Strong Central Government? Most everyone agrees that having a strong central controlled government is always important. But without it, we know as humans that we really can’t self-govern ourselves. Because we are not perfect human beings; If there was no strong central government, I can guarantee anybody that there will be more killing, theft, etc.; Basically more crime, if you heard of a video game call Tom Clancy’s The Division. Picture the whole country like that of the division, nothing under control complete chaos. Then there comes the standard in any human being the want for power or control over something or somebody. Let’s say a country is in a great state of depression or somehow the government controlling that country is failing and people want to up rise it and a new leader take over. This new leader is usually a complete dictatorship …show more content…
Think of the strong central government as a parent watching over you. Let’s say you wanted a cookie and your mom said no it would spoil your appetite for dinner. But when she was away you went ahead and grab a cookie, and you got caught equaling you get a punishment or some sort of consequences for your actions. Works the same way for a strong central controlled government. If for say you get caught speeding, thus you get a speeding ticket then you have to go to court to pay for the ticket. Another thing about us humans is that we are not perfect. So we usually end up doing some things that are bad or foreseen as wrong. Like I said in the above first paragraph; Thomas Hobbs makes another strong central point in my opinion about us humans “ Let him therefore consider with himself, when taking a journey, he arms himself and seeks to go well accompanied; when going to sleep, he locks his doors; when even in his house, he locks his chests;” (Hobbs Para
Show More

Related Documents: Strong Central Government

Federalist: United States and Strong Central Government Essay

to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s, the two philosophies were played out by the Federalist and the Republican parties conflicting in many different ways. The Federalists, represented by Alexander Hamilton, promoted the importance of a strong central government to succeed in the world, while the Republicans, represented by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, promoted the importance a smaller central government. Although the Federalists and…

Words 878 - Pages 4

Federalist AntiFederalist Essay

Members from this group believed in a strong and central government. The opposing party was called the Anti­Federalists and the believed that there should be a weak central government Opposing parties are essential to a functioning government because they create another step in our checks and balances system. While both parties were very different, they both cared deeply about the future of the United States and they wanted to make the United States as perfect as it could be. The Federalist party believed that a strong and central government would be best for the…

Words 599 - Pages 3

Constitution: United States Constitution and National Government Essay

between the central government and states. The third opinion was pro-citizen and wanted a loose central government and stronger state governments in order to protect the people. All three opinions agreed the Articles of Confederation were not working but had different opinions of how to fix it. The first opinion came from the Federalists, who believed the Americans should have united as a single nation around the Constitution. One argument the Federalists made was that a strong national government…

Words 587 - Pages 3

History 106 Essay

nation who strongly needed a central government. These documents will try to shape the lives of each American under specific laws. This central government will also try to provide stability for this young nation to overcome issues faced. It will provide rules to abide by while giving consequences to the individuals who choose otherwise. The power will be shifted to the states while concerns grew if they were going to have it ratified. The fear of an excessive government raises thoughts due to insecurity…

Words 570 - Pages 3

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Change Dbq

was the Constitution. With the Constitution, there would be a more defined government and a Bill of Rights thus fixing the Articles of Confederation proving the Constitution to be necessary. The Articles of Confederation had errors that needed to be corrected if those errors had not been corrected it would have lead to the destruction of the United States (Doc 3). The Articles gave very little power to a central government. After the Revolutionary War, the United States was in debt…

Words 324 - Pages 2

Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

Why did the framers of the constitution give more power to the Federal government rather than the State governments? The Articles of Confederation proved to be too weak and inconsistent to fit America’s people, so the founding fathers had to find a better government system that everyone agreed with. Moreover, the country split between Federalists and Antifederalists. The Articles had many weaknesses and few strengths for a governing document. There was not a national court (congress was the judge)…

Words 613 - Pages 3

Battle Of Valley Forge Essay

the Continental army while also indirectly showcasing the negatives of a weak or non-existent central government. In addition to that, the first seeds of a federalist government began to sprout during the battle of Valley Forge. The American military leaders identified the necessity of having a strong central due to the constant struggle and confusion of having to answer to multiple smaller state governments. “It was like surveying the battlefield not with binoculars but with a kaleidoscope. The only…

Words 941 - Pages 4

Comparison Of Monarchy And Anti-Federalism

Federalism Federalist always believed in a strong central government and wanted state powers to themselves and also agreed with the division of our government into three branches. Monarchy and Anti-Federalist would cause hostility in the nation. With a monarchy, people do not get a say in what happens with the government. The Anti-Federalist wanted to keep our government as is, and were against a strong central government. Anti-Federalist and Federalist During this time, British was a monarchy and…

Words 211 - Pages 1

Federalism Essay

America. In the late 18th century, America had finally broken off from Britain’s control and was looking for a new form of government. Originally, the Articles of Confederation connected the founding thirteen states of America, which was a beginner version of a constitution. This eventually became an issue since these articles did not give any power to the central government. Because of this, the states had many problems in international politics since they had just found freedom and did not have…

Words 1223 - Pages 5

Anti Federalists Dbq

individual rights, and the vision for an Agrarian Republic. Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and George Mason were the leaders of the Anti-Federalists and they strongly opposed having a strong government and weaker states (which would create by the Constitution). They preferred a strong states and a weaker government. After the American Revolution, many Americans liked their new freedoms that they gained and did not want to see them being taken again. The Articles of Confederation intentionally was…

Words 434 - Pages 2