If the sugary drinks are taxed and for some crazy reason everybody stopped buying the product completely, the people would just turn their attention to getting their sugar desires elsewhere. Ex. Snickers, Gummi Bears, junk food, etc… Also, sugar is not the primary source of obesity, though it is a contributing factor. There are usually excessive simple carbohydrates in the average persons diet, which results in the buildup of energy, and when not used the energy gets stored as...Fat! There are also many foods in our diets that contain gobs of fat and grease, we’ve got hamburgers, hot dogs, the list is endless. So obviously attacking sugar isn’t exactly a wise action on the government's’ part. “If people in San Francisco drink 31% less sugary soda, does it follow that they will become thinner and healthier? Probably not—and certainly not 31% thinner and healthier.” (Mitchell 1) Like stated before, Sugar banning isn’t a sure fire way to end or even slow down obesity. If you really want to get into Sin Taxes like Liquor or Tobacco Products, you’ve seen how well those have turned out, oh yeah tax all the bad things. But once we start “where do they end—Doughnuts? Caesar salad dressing? Whole milk instead of skim? (Cary