1. Any formal documents, written reports involving title, property, ownership, possession, or leasing rights that will serve as evidence for ownership. These formal documents may provide assurance of title, rights or ownership for the plaintiff whether the property is private, collective or common.
2. Any internal documents or written reports that exhibit legitimate correlation between customer traffic and the Fraser Highway widening project. These documents or written reports may provide new information for the defendant. Additionally, the information could be used as evidence if the plaintiff claims differently in court, thus harming the plaintiff’s credibility.
3. Any official documents that support the plaintiff’s rights to legally operate his/her company on the land. These documents will appropriately justify the plaintiff’s legal rights to maintain, operate, and provide company services at the…show more content… would be chosen for examination. There are many reasons behind choosing the owner of AAA Auto Body Shop Ltd. The first reason would be to uncover hidden material and confirm specific information that the other party had stated or implied in their lawsuit. To name a few, these questions may deal with potential injuries, damages, financial loss, costs, and expenses.
The second reason behind questioning the plaintiff would be to record the information they are currently stating and potentially use that information in court. If the plaintiff provides different or false information in court, the defendant could use the recorded information to argue against them. The defendant can use the examination questions as proof that the plaintiff is lying and they should not be trusted; harming the plaintiff’s credibility.
The third reason would be to compare information between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Both parties may be able to find specific areas of agreements and agree on facts that may not reinforce their claims in
