Vonnegut does not dispute the concept of war as a whole, Rather he says that methods of war should change to make it less awful, which may make some readers speculate that Slaughterhouse Five is a pro war book, however the way the Vonnegut talks about his and Billy’s experience in the war gives the book a much stronger and more …show more content…
No guts and glory. Just pain and suffering. Having to be filthy and sore and afraid all the time. The way war is shown both in Billy Pilgrim’s so called combat and his time in the prisoner of war camp proves that Vonnegut is attempting to show his readers that the act of war is not brave or heroic. It is a highly undesirable experience. This ruthful depiction give the whole book a very, very strong anti war message. He is showing the truth behind fighting in combat and how it will just eat away at a person's will to be happy and positive.
The argument that Vonnegut is writing Slaughterhouse Five as a pro war book really just doesn't hold up to the fact that he describes war a horrible thing. The fact that Billy Pilgrim was dropped into that horrid war is likely a big cause of a large amount of strife in his life. In Slaughterhouse Five Vonnegut paints war as one of the main antagonists the story. It is just a big manifestation of suffering and negativity that sticks with all who survived. All in all, yes, Slaughterhouse Five is most truly an anti war