-Do you think it’s ethical to allow high school students to play in …show more content…
If the Pacific Pro Football League does become a big competitor to collegiate recruiting, the NCAA will have to make their policies more lenient when it comes to athletes being able to accept what is now deemed as “extra benefits.” (NCAA). In my own experience, the reasons I played collegiate athletics rather than turn professional is to get an education and to grow my game by competing with elite college athletes. I know that these four years at Tennessee will only help me get better on the course, so that I am better prepared for when I turn professional. I was lucky enough to have the option to turn professional, but I decided that wasn’t the best option for me. For football, they do not have the option to play professionally right out of high school like I did, football players must go to college if they want to make it in the NFL (NFL). This idea of a professional league for young football players not only gives players more freedom in their path to the NFL, but allows them to start using their talents for payment earlier so that they can support themselves and their family. That is usually the motive for athletes turning professional earlier rather than later. Athletes want to start making money, and in the NCAA athletes cannot receive payment or any “extra benefits” or they will be ineligible. If the NCAA doesn’t want to lose athletes to professional leagues such as the Pacific Pro Football league, the answer isn’t to start paying college athletes salary, but to consider deregulating the lives of student-athletes. Give the student-athlete the right to their name and likeness (NCAA), and give them the right to accept free meals or merchandise when a stranger or a donor is being generous (NCAA). Paying student athletes will never be a solution to any problem; it creates more inequality within college athletics because some athletes will be paid