Contract #1: Sarah vs “Kidz Go Bananaz”
According to the facts, we can say that there were 6 different potential contracts. The first potential contract was between Sarah and “Kidz Go Bananaz”. When she called asking them for the availability, the employee said Sure, we will there Sunday morning to set up (offer) she asked for the price and even when the said “you will know the price on Sunday evening (after the party finished) she said, “I accept” (Acceptance). Then they have a contract, based on a set or commitments or promises. Because at the end of the party Sarah wasn’t happy with the price they can decide what is a fair and reasonable price (adequacy of Consideration). She can refuse to pay and say in her defense that wasn’t a formal contract, because during the offer they never gave her the price (one of the conditions to make a contract forceable).…show more content… Melissa
After her friend, Melisa, gave her this recommendation Sarah was so happy that she offered to her friend who gave her the recommendation to call “Kidz Go Bananaz”, to get the next six massages for free, which was a Gratuitous Promise because this was a promise unsupported by consideration. This can be broken without any legal consequences. In this case, Melissa gives Sarah and advice and after that she offers the free massages (something of value), this type of consideration is wrong because there must be an exchange of something of value in exchange for receiving something of value from the other
