Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation System Essay

Sunnyside Teacher
Evaluation System
BEST Standards in Teaching
Rubric

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
Objectives:
 Introduce SUSD Teacher Evaluation

System History and Development.
 Review Key Components and Rating
Percentiles.
 Educate certified staff on State Initiated
Policy Mandates.
 Outline the Evaluation systems process, timelines and forms that will be used in the 2013/14 Implementation.
2

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation System
Committee Members
2011/2012

















Kathy Dong-SEA President
Lisa Volkening Teacher
Crystal Spicer Specialist PE Teacher
Debbie Dimmitt Teacher
Michael Franklin Teacher
Brian Huss Teacher
Jennifer Ambrosio Teacher (Coach)
Anne Urban Librarian
Lucy LiBosha Teacher
Erica Arvizu Teacher
Emma Carrillo Principal
Mary Montano Principal
John Benavidez Principal
Sue Tillis Director SPED
Anna Maiden HR
Dr. Debra Bergman Facilitator

Committee Members
2012/2013
 Kathy Dong-SEA President
 Lisa Volkening Teacher
 Crystal Spicer Teacher (Coach)
 Debbie Dimmitt Teacher
 Michael Franklin Teacher
 Brian Huss Teacher
 Jennifer Ambrosio Teacher (Coach)
 Anne Urban Librarian
 Martha Borquez Teacher
 Jackie Nickels Teacher
 Emma Carrillo Principal
 Roxana Rico Principal
 Mary Montano Principal
 Sue Tillis Director SPED
 Anna Maiden HR
 Dr. Debra Bergman
Facilitator
3

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
 Why

the Change?

 State Legislation oOn April 25, 2011, the State Board of Education
(SBE) unanimously passed the proposed Arizona
Framework for Measuring Educator
Effectiveness. This action resulted from the passage of SB 1040 that directed the SBE to adopt and maintain a model framework for teacher and principal evaluation that includes quantitative data on student academic progress.

4

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
Goals of the Committee:
 Design a system which embraces shared values about effective teaching for K-12 teachers and site principals.
 Ensure that both teachers and administrators participate in the building of the AZ K-12 Evaluation Framework.
 Increase the focus on the development of teacher expertise through the use of of a research based rubric.
5

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
 The District Evaluation committee kept the following two questions in mind while working through the development of this new system.
 How do you design a teacher evaluation system to ensure that it is fair, objective, and un-biased?
 What do we believe good teaching looks like? 6

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
 To address both questions, the District
Evaluation Committee recommended that the BEST Standards in Teaching
Rubric be used to determine the teacher performance component, which is 67% of the process.
 The remaining 33% of the evaluation process is determined by Student
Academic Growth.
7

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation System
BEST Standards in Teaching Rubric

8

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
 Current Policy:
 Orientation on the Teacher
Evaluation System must occur within the first three weeks of school.  Staff assigned to multiple sites must be assigned one qualified evaluator by the first student contact day.

9

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
 Policy: Key Definitions
 Qualified Evaluator- the
Superintendent shall recommend and the Board shall approve qualified evaluators on a yearly basis.
 Qualified evaluator training is offered yearly through the Arizona School
Board Association.
 Only qualified evaluators shall evaluate teachers.
10

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation
System
 Teacher Evaluation System
Handbook

11

Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation System
 Legislative Policy Changes:
 IDENTIFICATION:
Group A and B Teachers

Student
Growth

Group A
Teachers

Group B
Teachers

AIMS
Reading

Classroom
Level

Site Level

AIMS
Math

Classroom
Level

Site Level

Group A Teachers Must have 1-Year of
Consistent AIMS Data to
Qualify
Group B Teachers
 Do not have classroom level AIMS Data
12

Sunnyside Teacher

Show More

Related Documents: Sunnyside Teacher Evaluation System Essay

Essay about A Descriptive Study of the Practice of Music Therapy in Hong Kong