When you see the history of documentary film this movie makes a separation in time before and after. It is not because it is the best documentary ever made. This separation is because it is the first movie of this genre that was able to bring that much money in the profits. It became an instant hit and was part of several list of the best reviewed films of that year. Sets out to explore the reason(s) behind the massacre of 12 students and a teacher at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999. He documents how two students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, easily acquired four pieces of firearms, despite of having a history of arrests, juvenile detention, counseling sessions, and drug dependencies. He documents how the U.S. Has ended up as a country with the highest number of gun-related killings on Earth. With interviews with people like Charlton Heston, former President of the National Rifle Association, who lives in a fortified mansion, Moore shows how easy it is to acquire guns and munitions - with examples of a bank giving a free gun just for opening a bank account, and of one particular municipality that makes gun-ownership mandatory. Moore then links the involvement of the U.S. with tyrants and terrorists such as Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden for its' own narrow gains - resulting in the deaths of millions of civilians from 1953 through to 2001 - and its' refusal to review…show more content… Bullying and mistread of people got to a height that push those being abused to get revenge. The problem with the vendetta is that it became vicious and dangerous. They were looking to affect the whole student body doesn't matter if those students were responsible for the bullying. The whole campus was responsible for the alienation of those students and they had to pay the ultimate price
