Firstly, Gibney indignantly traces the Dilawar-case back to what he views as the Bush Administration’s suspension of habeus corpus( a judicial mandate to a prison official ordering that an inmate be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that person is imprisoned lawfully and whether or not he should be released from custody) and the defiance and violation of the Geneva Conventions. Secondly, when this reason begins to seem like too much of a stretch, he quickly mentions that the same type of corruption is had been going on within the C.I.A, never mentioning the fact that this organization has been involved with far less problems under Bush’s Presidency than it was under those of Bush’s father, Clinton, Carter and Reagan .In addition, Gibney rarely considers that there could have been a possibility that the internal corruption related to executives in the US military could have been entirely to blame for those wrongly-conducted of torture. Fourthly, this documentary is missing a clear explanation as to why these violations of the US Constitution and the Geneva Conventions have emerged, or at the least a detailed exposure of the role played by both major political parties in this process. Lastly, by concentrating on the impact of these policies on the United States and western society, it only briefly listens to the victims of the terror and their families, and thus it misses an opportunity to return to them the humanity, dignity and sense of justice of which they have been