This article is being told in the point of view of IAAF and why it thinks that elevated levels of testosterone ruin the integrity of women’s athletics. It also includes examples of contradictory points discovered by studies and concerned athletes. The piece is geared towards any track and field fan or avid readers of the New York Times. It intends to inform the audience about a never ending controversy and even mentions that during the past nobody really bothered checking testosterone levels in female athletes. Therefore in the past, it was considered acceptable to dope as many women got away with this practice. Throughout the article, other athletes are calling out Caster Semaya for being too good and the writing makes it seem that nobody else has had a chance to beat her in middle distance events. Also, the piece is biased and does not support either side of the argument. There is also questioning the intentions of the IAAF and the reliability of recently conducted scientific studies, in many places. The article says that female athletes with elevated testosterone levels may have to compete with males. This reasoning is unfair and could lead to an increased risk of injury since females have to perform at a higher level, as a result of men’s overall athletic abilities. Women feel unmotivated about being with men and end up dropping the sport all together