The Bolshevik Revolution And The Collapse Of The Romanov Family

Words: 463
Pages: 2
Open Document
Thirty Palaces, with estates in Finland, Poland, and the Crimea, millions of acres in farmland, gold and silver mines, oil and timber resources, and endless collection of priceless artwork, five yachts, two private trains, and countless horses, carriages, and cars. Tsar Nicholas was one of the wealthiest monarchs in history, with a family wealth that was estimated at 45$ billion in today’s US currency. However, while the nobles were living in luxury, the Russian people were suffering in deplorable conditions. One quote from a Russian writer states that, “nobles and the upper class envisioned that Russian commoners lived in simple yet cozy huts, their checks glowing with good health and their teeth whiter than the purest ivory.” This was in fact far from the truth, with most russian peasants never sleeping in a proper bed, never owning a pair of good leather …show more content…
The massive class difference would led to the Bolshevik Revolution that would cost the Romanov family their lives and end a 300 year old dynasty.
The Bolshevik uprising stemmed from angry and mistreatment the people of Russia at the time were suffering, most importantly food shortages. On February 23, 1917, an estimated 90,000 men and women textile workers went on strike. This strike continued to escalate, the city fell to the protesters and on March 15, 1917 Nicholas II abdicated and the Russian monarchy fell. The Royal family consisting of former Tsar Nicholas II, Tsarina Alexandra, their children the former Grand Duchesses Olga, Tatiana, Maria, and Anastasia, and former Tsarevich Alexei were placed under house arrest outside of Petrograd. However, they were later moved to exile in Ekaterinburg Siberia. They would remain in exile until there
Show More

Related Documents: The Bolshevik Revolution And The Collapse Of The Romanov Family

Corin and Fein Essays

a major source of anger, matched only by the band of vodka • Strikes broke out in 1915 and increased in number frequency and militancy turn 1916 • He wore also took a toll on a more personal way as the list of casualties noted there was hardly a family that had not been affected by son killed or captured The role of the Tsar in the war • The support that bizarre enjoyed it the beginning of the war faded as the military defeats Continued • Like 1905 confidence in the government evaporated…

Words 5180 - Pages 21