' The Necklace, And Their Negative Impact On The Protagonist

Submitted By mitchellryanegan
Words: 2209
Pages: 9
Open Document
Sarah Schwartz
Mrs. McClung
ENG4U
March 6th, 2015

The Similarities and Differences of the Secondary Characters John (“The Yellow Wallpaper”) and M. Loisel (“The Necklace”) and Their Negative Impact on the Protagonists
Secondary characters can negatively affect the protagonist and may be the reason for their downfall. Specifically, their behavior and established roles in their relationship may cause the destruction of the main character over the course of the story. “The Yellow Wallpaper”, by Charlotte Gilman, is the story of a woman who is told by her husband, John, to stay in the room until she gets better. The main character slowly descends into madness, fixating on tearing off the yellow wallpaper and freeing a woman trapped inside. In comparison, “The Necklace”, by Guy de Maupassant, is the tale of a woman who strongly believes she belongs in a higher class and forces her husband, M. Loisel, to give her money to buy a new dress for a large gala. At the event, Mathilde loses a borrowed necklace. Her family must descend into debt and spend the following 10 years poorer than before to pay for a replacement necklace, all while Mathilde’s character crumbles over time. Although the two story lines are very different from one another, both share the analogous quality of the protagonist’s husband driving to the undoing of his wife. In contrast, John holds the control in the marriage, speaking his own mind whereas M. Loisel is manipulated and retains his opinions to himself. Both characters similarly try to help their wives in best way they think possible and lead to the collapse of that character.

The husbands fall into opposite roles for the control of power in their relationship, however both are found to advance the downfall of their wives. John upholds the position of the manipulator, whereas Mr. Loisel portrays himself as manipulated. The controller of the relationship in “The Yellow Wallpaper” refuses to give his wife freedom and does not permit her to carry out certain activities. Jane wishes to go and make a visit to Cousin Henry and Julia, but John rejects her desires. Despite her pleas, Jane quotes that John “says he would as soon put fireworks in my pillow-case as to let me have those stimulating people about now” (Gilman 649). His wife feels “it is so discouraging not to have any advice and companionship” (Gilman 649), and he does not realize that it is slowly driving Jane to madness. By keeping his wife isolated in the house with only himself, their child, and his sister, John is pushing his wife to insanity from the lack of comfort from familiar faces. With John always away at work, his wife stays alone in her room all day with nothing but her thoughts. John, in another act of manipulation, does not approve of Jane’s writing and marks an imprint in her mind. This causes her to suffer from a guilty conscious when she acts upon her desires. The act of writing “exhaust[s] [Jane] a good deal – having to be so sly about it, or else meet with heavy opposition” (Gilman 648). John therefore ruins his wife’s distraction and pastime, constraining her creativity and voice. By taking away Jane’s ability to express herself freely in writing and in speech with her loved ones, John, as a secondary character, is helping the destruction of the protagonist by pushing her closer to a state of delirium. On the opposite end of the scale, having no control over the main character can also be ineffective in attempt to prevent her from her downfall. M. Loisel knows Mathilde is deeply unhappy with her life and he therefore goes to any extent to please his wife. He is manipulated into giving her everything that he can. Firstly, he obtains a ticket to the gala for Mathilde but states, “I had awful trouble to get it. Every one wants to go; it is very select, and they are not giving many invitations to clerks” (Maupassant 2). When Mathilde exclaims that she cannot attend the event without a proper dress, she begins to cry. M. Loisel,
Show More

Related Documents: ' The Necklace, And Their Negative Impact On The Protagonist

Cask Of Amontillado

Point of View of “ The Cask Of Amontillado” By Edgar Allen Poe “The Cask of Amontillado” is told in the first person point of view by Montresor. Montresor is a wealthy and knowledgeable man. As a narrator he is considered to be unreliable as he is shown to be a mad man throughout the story. This makes it harder to rely on what he says and causes the story to seem more biased to his point of view, instead of telling it from a less biased view like a third person narrator. The very first…

Words 371 - Pages 2

Cask Of Amontillado

The setting in any story is one of the most important elements. The setting is simply when and where the story takes. In the story “A Cask of Amontillado,” Poe uses setting to illustrate the narrator, Montresor intentions to retaliate on a former friend, Fortunato. The time of this story really is not stated, but the story was published during the 1800s. Although Poe states in his final lines of the short story, “For the half of a century no mortal has disturbed them” (113). The time is set at dusk…

Words 207 - Pages 1

The Irony In The Cask Of Amontillado

Journal Entry #6 - Irony in “A Cask of Amontillado” It is important to be able understand and interpret irony while reading Edgar Allen Poe’s short story, “A Cask of Amontillado”, due to the fact that irony plays such a vital and critical role in the story. Irony, by definition, is a state of affairs or an event that seems deliberately contrary to what one expects. Throughout the entirety of “A Cask of Amontillado”, there are many cases in which different types of irony are used. For instance…

Words 273 - Pages 2

The Cask Of Amontillado Essay

The Cask of Amontillado Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. Comprehension The questions below refer to the selection “The Cask of Amontillado.” ____ 1. According to Montresor, he decides to seek revenge against Fortunato because Fortunato — a. attacked him with his fists c. insulted him b. injured him more than a thousand times d. stole some valuable wine from him ____ 2. According to Montresor, revenge would not be successful if he…

Words 967 - Pages 4

The Cask Of Amontillado Persuasive

In “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe, Montresor is presented as a sneaky, persuasive, and violent character. Montresor is shown to be sneaky in the story when he is secretly planning on killing Fortunato for insulting him. “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could; but when he ventures upon insult, I vowed revenge” (Poe 372). This quote shows that Montresor is desperate because, he is doing everything he can accomplish to get Fortunato alone in the catacombs with…

Words 234 - Pages 1

The Cask of Amontillado Essay

Nadia Islam Eng-102 (CGA): Professor Sateriale Formal Response 4 3 March 2013 The Cask of Amontillado Edgar Allan Poe, an American short-story writer, essayist, and poet, published “The Cask of Amontillado” in 1846. It was his last, and some say greatest, short story. It’s a tale of revenge, death, fear, and trust set in a vast underground Italian catacomb (underground cemetery). The whole plot deals with the inebriation and, ultimately, the live burial of the antagonist, Fortunato. The…

Words 813 - Pages 4

The Irony In The Cask Of Amontillado

Irony of “The Cask of Amontillado” As we all know, our knees are in the essence of a lot of subjects. Some either being a person's words, actions, that signify the offset for a humorous or in Fattic effort. In the story of, “The Cask of Amontillado”, Edgar Allan Poe uses Fortunato, the Masons, and the jester, to describe irony in the story. Firstly, an intriguing aspect to show irony in, “The Cask of Amontillado”, is Fortunato. Although the name, “Fortunato”, is a elegantly vibrant…

Words 363 - Pages 2

cask of amontillado Essay

Jocelyn Stewart March 11, 2014 English 102-108 Fiction Essay "A Cask of Amontillado" The short story "A Cask of Amontillado", by Edgar Allen Poe, Poe takes the reader into the thoughts of a murderer for revenge. The major theme to "A Cask of Amontillado" is pride versus revenge as well as humiliation. The reader is experiencing the horror of dramatic irony that we, the audience, knows that Montresor has planned to murder Fortunado, while Fortunado does not. Personally, I can relate to Montresor…

Words 826 - Pages 4

Fortunato In The Cask Of Amontillado

this short story ¨The Cask of Amontillado¨, the character Fortunato can be described as self-centered. For instance on page 210 “You were not to be found, and I was fearful of losing a bargain.” Mainly Montresor knows that Fortunato will be tempted by the hope of making money the imaginary Spanish wine if he tells his victim, which is Fortunato that he bought it at a bargain price. He is being greedy with his money and thinks he should be spending it one of a kind Amontillado. Another example is on…

Words 342 - Pages 2

Revenge In The Cask Of Amontillado

Vengeance, revenge, retribution; something defined as the act of inflicting harm or punishment upon someone in return for a wrong endured at their hands. “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allan Poe, revolves around this very concept of revenge along with other aspects related to a man’s thoughts and desires. Set in the early nineteenth century, this short story represents gothic literature, comprised of horror, terror, mystery and the dark, gloomy side of man. The genre of "Gothic Literature" emerged…

Words 245 - Pages 1